Congress enacted the Endangered Species Act, Animal Welfare Act, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act to protect and preserve endangered and threatened fish and wildlife, animals, and marine mammals. The United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) is the primary administrative agency in charge of regulating zoos, wildlife centers, and aquariums, yet fails to consistently enforce the Animal Welfare Act, which this Comment reviews. This means that private animal advocacy agencies are left suing zoos, wildlife centers, and aquariums under the “taking” clause of the Endangered Species Act in order to ensure animal safety and care. While most circuits agree upon what rises to a “taking”, the Eleventh Circuit has taken a different position. ...
Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) developed under Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) hav...
In the 2017 case, New Mexico Department of Game & Fish v. United States Department of the Interior, ...
In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
Congress enacted the Endangered Species Act, Animal Welfare Act, and the Marine Mammal Protection Ac...
In recent years, Congress has passed a number of laws that direct various government agencies to saf...
This Article investigates how the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Serv...
In 2009, Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C. proposed to build a 678-mile pipeline from Wyoming to Oregon that wou...
In January 1993, the U.S. Fish & Wild Life Service (“FWS”) added the delta smelt, a small, silvery b...
The federal government has spent the last thirty years regulating activities that affect endangered ...
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act, or the ESA, strictly prohibits any person or other entity f...
The Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) promotes itself as the “gold standard” for animal welfar...
Environmental organizations have experienced a string of recent courtroom successes enforcing the fe...
This Note explores both the judicial and administrative underenforcement of the Animal Welfare Act i...
In the 2017 case, New Mexico Department of Game \u26 Fish v. United States Department of the Interio...
Managing endangered species in captivity presents a unique set of problems. Despite their enormous p...
Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) developed under Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) hav...
In the 2017 case, New Mexico Department of Game & Fish v. United States Department of the Interior, ...
In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
Congress enacted the Endangered Species Act, Animal Welfare Act, and the Marine Mammal Protection Ac...
In recent years, Congress has passed a number of laws that direct various government agencies to saf...
This Article investigates how the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Serv...
In 2009, Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C. proposed to build a 678-mile pipeline from Wyoming to Oregon that wou...
In January 1993, the U.S. Fish & Wild Life Service (“FWS”) added the delta smelt, a small, silvery b...
The federal government has spent the last thirty years regulating activities that affect endangered ...
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act, or the ESA, strictly prohibits any person or other entity f...
The Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) promotes itself as the “gold standard” for animal welfar...
Environmental organizations have experienced a string of recent courtroom successes enforcing the fe...
This Note explores both the judicial and administrative underenforcement of the Animal Welfare Act i...
In the 2017 case, New Mexico Department of Game \u26 Fish v. United States Department of the Interio...
Managing endangered species in captivity presents a unique set of problems. Despite their enormous p...
Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) developed under Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) hav...
In the 2017 case, New Mexico Department of Game & Fish v. United States Department of the Interior, ...
In Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Department of the Navy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...