The decisional law of the First Amendment is an area of law formulated, for the most part, by the high court of the land. At the same time, the study of free speech is equally a study in political philosophy and law. Supreme Court justices have left their mark on the First Amendment free speech doctrine and have made names for themselves in the process. This study explores the impact of Chief Justice John Roberts and the Roberts Court on the free speech doctrine. By examining the case law in this area and the justices and lawyers who craft it, this study paints a picture of the current status of the doctrine and provides insight on its future development
Despite its many good qualities, Eternally Vigilant nevertheless suffers from a flaw common to First...
The First Amendment can be viewed as history, as policy, and as theory, but from a lawyer\u27s persp...
What does it mean for the Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John Roberts, to be “good” when it come...
This article contends that the Roberts Court, in the period from 2006 to 2016, arguably became the m...
In its first ten years, the Roberts Court proved to be the most speech protective Court in a generat...
INTRODUCTION The Roberts Court has made a lot of First Amendment law. Since Chief Justice John Rober...
On April 9, 2021, Geoffrey R. Stone delivered the following introductory remarks at The Roberts Cour...
In Managed Speech: The Roberts Court’s First Amendment, First Amendment scholar Gregory Magarian exp...
Since the appointment of Chief Justice G. Roberts to the U.S. Supreme Court, political scientists an...
The Supreme Court’s First Amendment decisions make a system of canals for the flow of public discuss...
On April 9, 2021, scholars gathered at Brooklyn Law School to consider the free speech themes highli...
Using the United States Supreme Court’s 2019 rulings in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck,...
On April 9, 2021, the Brooklyn Law Review gathered a panel of First Amendment scholars for a symposi...
This is an edited version of a speech delivered on December 16, 2010 in Washington, D.C., as part of...
Two of the most high-profile decisions in the Supreme Court\u27s October 2010 term were clear victor...
Despite its many good qualities, Eternally Vigilant nevertheless suffers from a flaw common to First...
The First Amendment can be viewed as history, as policy, and as theory, but from a lawyer\u27s persp...
What does it mean for the Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John Roberts, to be “good” when it come...
This article contends that the Roberts Court, in the period from 2006 to 2016, arguably became the m...
In its first ten years, the Roberts Court proved to be the most speech protective Court in a generat...
INTRODUCTION The Roberts Court has made a lot of First Amendment law. Since Chief Justice John Rober...
On April 9, 2021, Geoffrey R. Stone delivered the following introductory remarks at The Roberts Cour...
In Managed Speech: The Roberts Court’s First Amendment, First Amendment scholar Gregory Magarian exp...
Since the appointment of Chief Justice G. Roberts to the U.S. Supreme Court, political scientists an...
The Supreme Court’s First Amendment decisions make a system of canals for the flow of public discuss...
On April 9, 2021, scholars gathered at Brooklyn Law School to consider the free speech themes highli...
Using the United States Supreme Court’s 2019 rulings in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck,...
On April 9, 2021, the Brooklyn Law Review gathered a panel of First Amendment scholars for a symposi...
This is an edited version of a speech delivered on December 16, 2010 in Washington, D.C., as part of...
Two of the most high-profile decisions in the Supreme Court\u27s October 2010 term were clear victor...
Despite its many good qualities, Eternally Vigilant nevertheless suffers from a flaw common to First...
The First Amendment can be viewed as history, as policy, and as theory, but from a lawyer\u27s persp...
What does it mean for the Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John Roberts, to be “good” when it come...