A minimal essentialism (‘intrinsic biological essentialism’) about natural kinds is required to explain the projectability of human science terms. Human classifications that yield robust and ampliative projectable inferences refer to biological kinds. I articulate this argument with reference to an intrinsic essentialist account of HPC kinds. This account implies that human sciences (e.g., medicine, psychiatry) that aim to formulate predictive kind categories should classify biological kinds. Issues concerning psychiatric classification and pluralism are examined
This paper offers an overview of "the species problem", arguing for a view of species as homeostatic...
Natural kinds, real kinds, or, following J.S Mill simply, Kinds, are thought to be an important asse...
Theories of natural kinds can be seen to face a twofold task: First, they should provide an ontologi...
A minimal essentialism (‘intrinsic biological essentialism’) about natural kinds is required to expl...
The vision of natural kinds that is most common in the modern philosophy of biology, particularly wi...
This essay examines the proposal that psychological essentialism results from a history of natural s...
This paper addresses the question of how human science categories yield projectable inferences by cr...
After the rise of Darwin’s theory of evolution it seemed that the much-feared ghost of tra...
This paper addresses the question of how human science categories yield projectable inferences by cr...
The paper considers whether psychiatric kinds can be natural kinds and concludes that they can. This...
This paper addresses philosophical issues concerning whether mental disorders are natural kinds and ...
Psychological essentialism has been subject to much debate. Yet a key implication – that people sho...
Both lay people and scientists organize the world around them by categorizing particular things (obj...
Essentialism is widely regarded as a mistaken view of biological kinds, such as species. After recou...
This paper offers an overview of "the species problem", arguing for a view of species as homeostatic...
Natural kinds, real kinds, or, following J.S Mill simply, Kinds, are thought to be an important asse...
Theories of natural kinds can be seen to face a twofold task: First, they should provide an ontologi...
A minimal essentialism (‘intrinsic biological essentialism’) about natural kinds is required to expl...
The vision of natural kinds that is most common in the modern philosophy of biology, particularly wi...
This essay examines the proposal that psychological essentialism results from a history of natural s...
This paper addresses the question of how human science categories yield projectable inferences by cr...
After the rise of Darwin’s theory of evolution it seemed that the much-feared ghost of tra...
This paper addresses the question of how human science categories yield projectable inferences by cr...
The paper considers whether psychiatric kinds can be natural kinds and concludes that they can. This...
This paper addresses philosophical issues concerning whether mental disorders are natural kinds and ...
Psychological essentialism has been subject to much debate. Yet a key implication – that people sho...
Both lay people and scientists organize the world around them by categorizing particular things (obj...
Essentialism is widely regarded as a mistaken view of biological kinds, such as species. After recou...
This paper offers an overview of "the species problem", arguing for a view of species as homeostatic...
Natural kinds, real kinds, or, following J.S Mill simply, Kinds, are thought to be an important asse...
Theories of natural kinds can be seen to face a twofold task: First, they should provide an ontologi...