In this article I examine “Ontology Matters!” (OM!) arguments. OM! arguments conclude that ontology can contribute to empirical success in social science. First, I capture the common form between different OM! arguments. Second, I describe quantifier variance as discussed in metaontology. Third, I apply quantifier variance to the common form of OM! arguments. I then present two ways in which ontology is prior to social science methodology, one realist and one pragmatic. I argue that a pragmatic interpretation of ontology’s priority gives proponents of realist OM! arguments a special burden that they must meet to render their argument successful
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
In this article I examine “Ontology Matters!” (OM!) arguments. OM! arguments conclude that ontology ...
This article addresses Simon Lohse’s and Daniel Little’s responses to my article “Is Social Ontology...
Recent contributions to the philosophy of social sciences have motivated ontological commitments usi...
In this article, I will discuss two prominent views on the relevance and irrelevance of ontological ...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Social ontological inquiry has been pursued in analytic philosophy as well as in the social scientif...
This article addresses Simon Lohse’s and Daniel Little’s responses to my article “Is Social Ontology...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
In this article I examine “Ontology Matters!” (OM!) arguments. OM! arguments conclude that ontology ...
This article addresses Simon Lohse’s and Daniel Little’s responses to my article “Is Social Ontology...
Recent contributions to the philosophy of social sciences have motivated ontological commitments usi...
In this article, I will discuss two prominent views on the relevance and irrelevance of ontological ...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Social ontological inquiry has been pursued in analytic philosophy as well as in the social scientif...
This article addresses Simon Lohse’s and Daniel Little’s responses to my article “Is Social Ontology...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...
Discussions on the alleged methodological specificity of social knowledge are fueled to not the leas...