This paper introduces and defends an account of model-based science that I dub model pluralism. I argue that despite a growing awareness in the philosophy of science literature of the multiplicity, diversity, and richness of models and modeling-practices, more radical conclusions follow from this recognition than have previously been inferred. Going against the tendency within the literature to generalize from single models, I explicate and defend the following two core theses: (i) any successful analysis of models must target sets of models, their multiplicity of functions within science, and their scientific context and history and (ii) for almost any aspect x of phenomenon y, scientists require multiple models to achieve scientific goal ...
In this paper, I comment on Raffaella Campaner’s (forthcoming) overview of the debate on explanatory...
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of research approache...
Heintz, Charbonneau, and Fogelman present plurality as a hallmark of the social sciences. Taking inv...
This paper introduces and defends an account of model-based science that I dub model pluralism. I ar...
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of research approache...
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of research approache...
Epistemic pluralists often argue that different epistemic perspectives in science are equally warran...
This dissertation is concerned with the in-principle limitations on mathematical modelling in scienc...
In my research I have been concerned with the existence of multiple models of the same phenomenon. A...
Traditionally, a scientific model is thought to provide a good scientific explanation to the extent ...
This paper constitutes a radical departure from the existing philosophical literature on models, mod...
There is a sense in which pluralism needs no advocate. It is enough to take a quick look at contempo...
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of knowledge systems ...
In this paper, I comment on Raffaella Campaner’s (forthcoming) overview of the debate on explanatory...
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of research approache...
Heintz, Charbonneau, and Fogelman present plurality as a hallmark of the social sciences. Taking inv...
This paper introduces and defends an account of model-based science that I dub model pluralism. I ar...
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of research approache...
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of research approache...
Epistemic pluralists often argue that different epistemic perspectives in science are equally warran...
This dissertation is concerned with the in-principle limitations on mathematical modelling in scienc...
In my research I have been concerned with the existence of multiple models of the same phenomenon. A...
Traditionally, a scientific model is thought to provide a good scientific explanation to the extent ...
This paper constitutes a radical departure from the existing philosophical literature on models, mod...
There is a sense in which pluralism needs no advocate. It is enough to take a quick look at contempo...
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of knowledge systems ...
In this paper, I comment on Raffaella Campaner’s (forthcoming) overview of the debate on explanatory...
Scientific pluralism, a normative endorsement of the plurality or multiplicity of research approache...
Heintz, Charbonneau, and Fogelman present plurality as a hallmark of the social sciences. Taking inv...