Durbin and Hicks offered a provocative critique of current research linking personality traits with psychopathology. We had a generally positive response to their article despite reservations about classifying an entire field as stagnant. We describe our reservations and suggest that their developmental approach represents an important opportunity to create synergy across a number of sub–disciplines within psychology. We then underscore their point about the importance of process when attempting to understand the dynamic connections between personality traits and psychopathology
Cervone, Shadel, Smith, and Fiori (2006) make a strong case for enhancing theoretical coherence in t...
Some commentators wholeheartedly disagreed with the central tenet of the network perspective on pers...
Several strands of research converge to suggest that personality and psychopathology can be integrat...
Durbin and Hicks concluded in their paper on personality-psychopathology relationships that the fiel...
Durbin and Hicks concluded in their paper on personality-psychopathology relationships that the fiel...
Durbin and Hicks concluded in their paper on personality-psychopathology relationships that the fiel...
We concur with Durbin and Hicks and underscore the necessity to develop adequate models enabling the...
Hooker and McAdams (2003) offer a six-foci model of personality organized around the concepts of str...
The article by Hooker and McAdams (2003) challenges psychologists to rethink some of the theoretical...
Mõttus alerts us to the widespread predictive heterogeneity of different indicators of the same trai...
In this target article, we argue that personality processes, personality structure, and personality ...
Baumert and colleagues argued that research on between-and within-individual differences and express...
OBJECTIVE: We asked authors of this Special Issue to answer the following four questions: (1) Is the...
© 2015 European Association of Personality Psychology. There is a well-established tradition of asse...
There are systematic and meaningful links among normal and abnormal personality traits and Axis I an...
Cervone, Shadel, Smith, and Fiori (2006) make a strong case for enhancing theoretical coherence in t...
Some commentators wholeheartedly disagreed with the central tenet of the network perspective on pers...
Several strands of research converge to suggest that personality and psychopathology can be integrat...
Durbin and Hicks concluded in their paper on personality-psychopathology relationships that the fiel...
Durbin and Hicks concluded in their paper on personality-psychopathology relationships that the fiel...
Durbin and Hicks concluded in their paper on personality-psychopathology relationships that the fiel...
We concur with Durbin and Hicks and underscore the necessity to develop adequate models enabling the...
Hooker and McAdams (2003) offer a six-foci model of personality organized around the concepts of str...
The article by Hooker and McAdams (2003) challenges psychologists to rethink some of the theoretical...
Mõttus alerts us to the widespread predictive heterogeneity of different indicators of the same trai...
In this target article, we argue that personality processes, personality structure, and personality ...
Baumert and colleagues argued that research on between-and within-individual differences and express...
OBJECTIVE: We asked authors of this Special Issue to answer the following four questions: (1) Is the...
© 2015 European Association of Personality Psychology. There is a well-established tradition of asse...
There are systematic and meaningful links among normal and abnormal personality traits and Axis I an...
Cervone, Shadel, Smith, and Fiori (2006) make a strong case for enhancing theoretical coherence in t...
Some commentators wholeheartedly disagreed with the central tenet of the network perspective on pers...
Several strands of research converge to suggest that personality and psychopathology can be integrat...