We have found that we made a mistake when we estimated the H2O2 concentration by the colorimetric method in our paper [1]. he H2O2 concentration was estimated using the colorimetric method based on the reaction of H2O2 and Ti(SO4)2 in strong acid (Ti4+ + H2O2 + 2H2O → H2TiO4 + 4 H+). The H2O2 concentration (CH2O2) is proportional to the absorption intensity at 410 nm (I410 nm), originating from the yellow-coloured H2TiO4 [2–5], (Formula Presented) where k is the proportionality. In our paper, a wrong k of 1.23 was used instead of the right one of 3.7. Therefore, the H2O2 concentration shown in figures 2, 3, 5 and 6 must be corrected. The corrected figures are presented here. Since our discussion is not concerned with the absolute concentra...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
The authors regret an error in the Fig. 2(d) caption. The text "U=1.3 V" in the published version sh...
We find that we made a mistake in the estimation of the H2O2 concentration by the colorimetric metho...
The authors acknowledge the contribution of Prof. Bruno G. Pollet and his research group in the ?eld...
Introduction (page 1) ‘The scenario dramatically changed as Haruta et al. (1985) and Hutchings (1987...
We realized that the legend of Figure S20 in the Supporting Information contains mistakes. The UV-vi...
Volume 206, Number 1 (February 15, 2002), in the research note Hydrogen Spillover from a Metal Oxid...
The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 5, in which x-axis beneath panel c w...
The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 5, in which x-axis beneath panel c w...
The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 5, in which x-axis beneath panel c w...
The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 5, in which x-axis beneath panel c w...
The authors regret that a technical mistake has been discovered, which impacts the current density a...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
The authors regret an error in the Fig. 2(d) caption. The text "U=1.3 V" in the published version sh...
We find that we made a mistake in the estimation of the H2O2 concentration by the colorimetric metho...
The authors acknowledge the contribution of Prof. Bruno G. Pollet and his research group in the ?eld...
Introduction (page 1) ‘The scenario dramatically changed as Haruta et al. (1985) and Hutchings (1987...
We realized that the legend of Figure S20 in the Supporting Information contains mistakes. The UV-vi...
Volume 206, Number 1 (February 15, 2002), in the research note Hydrogen Spillover from a Metal Oxid...
The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 5, in which x-axis beneath panel c w...
The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 5, in which x-axis beneath panel c w...
The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 5, in which x-axis beneath panel c w...
The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 5, in which x-axis beneath panel c w...
The authors regret that a technical mistake has been discovered, which impacts the current density a...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
The authors regret an error in the Fig. 2(d) caption. The text "U=1.3 V" in the published version sh...