I want to thank all the contributors for their thoughtful comments on the book, Brown, J. (2018). Fallibilism: Evidence and knowledge. Oxford University Press. I’ve tried to respond to as many of their points as possible within the space available.Publisher PDFNon peer reviewe
In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad ...
Publisher Copyright: © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Rodrigo Borges and Ian Schnee; individua...
Scepticism about justification is the view that justification is impossible. Underdetermination scep...
I want to thank all the contributors for their thoughtful comments on the book, Brown, J. (2018). Fa...
According to Probability 1 Infallibilism (henceforth, Infallibilism), if one knows that p, then the ...
I give a critical overview of the volume, focusing my attention on the chapters that deal with the e...
I’d like to thank my critics for their thoughtful and challenging commentary. I appreciate the time ...
In this paper I argue for a doctrine I call 'infallibilism', which I stipulate to mean that If S kno...
Bandyopadhyay, Taper, and Brittan (BTB) advance a measure of evidential support that first appeared ...
Inference to the best explanation has at times appeared almost indistinguishable from a rule that re...
This paper comprises a defence of Infallibilism about knowledge. In it, I articulate two arguments i...
In their response to our paper, Nicholson and Ridgway agree with the majority of what we wrote. The...
Abstract This is a response to the comments of Boghossian (Philos Stud, 2016. doi:10.1007/s11098-016...
We would like to thank an anonymous referee for his helpful comments on a previous version of this p...
According to the fallibilist, it is possible for us to know things when our evidence doesn't entail ...
In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad ...
Publisher Copyright: © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Rodrigo Borges and Ian Schnee; individua...
Scepticism about justification is the view that justification is impossible. Underdetermination scep...
I want to thank all the contributors for their thoughtful comments on the book, Brown, J. (2018). Fa...
According to Probability 1 Infallibilism (henceforth, Infallibilism), if one knows that p, then the ...
I give a critical overview of the volume, focusing my attention on the chapters that deal with the e...
I’d like to thank my critics for their thoughtful and challenging commentary. I appreciate the time ...
In this paper I argue for a doctrine I call 'infallibilism', which I stipulate to mean that If S kno...
Bandyopadhyay, Taper, and Brittan (BTB) advance a measure of evidential support that first appeared ...
Inference to the best explanation has at times appeared almost indistinguishable from a rule that re...
This paper comprises a defence of Infallibilism about knowledge. In it, I articulate two arguments i...
In their response to our paper, Nicholson and Ridgway agree with the majority of what we wrote. The...
Abstract This is a response to the comments of Boghossian (Philos Stud, 2016. doi:10.1007/s11098-016...
We would like to thank an anonymous referee for his helpful comments on a previous version of this p...
According to the fallibilist, it is possible for us to know things when our evidence doesn't entail ...
In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad ...
Publisher Copyright: © 2024 selection and editorial matter, Rodrigo Borges and Ian Schnee; individua...
Scepticism about justification is the view that justification is impossible. Underdetermination scep...