PhD in Aerospace

This thesis deals with the aerodynamics of aero-engine nacelles with a focus on the influence of a short and slim nacelle design on the drag performance. As turbofan engines are designed with increasingly reduced specific thrusts in order to improve propulsive efficiency, the fan diameter tends to grow. With a larger fan, the engine weight and nacelle drag grow which may offset the benefit from the reduced specific thrust. It is imperative to determine if a reduced length and thickness nacelle, compared to a conventional design, will enable the viable use of these reduced specific thrust aero-engine designs. The research aims to answer this question with a focus on cruise drag, spillage drag, drag rise and windmill performance of isolated and installed short, and slim nacelles. An innovative optimisation process was developed with a computational fluid dynamics process included as a means to evaluate nacelle drag. This was applied to different nacelle designs in a novel design space to optimise for cruise and off-design performance with a multi-objective genetic algorithm. The optimisation routine was extensively tested and verified against a number of analytical functions to ensure it could adequately approximate optimal Pareto sets. The optimisation of both axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric nacelles was carried out on drag, spillage and drag rise Mach number as well as on two metrics which control the pressure distribution of the nacelle. Optimal nacelles were then chosen to study the influence of nacelle incidence, the windmill condition and installation onto an aircraft on the drag performance and to provide a new quantification of these impacts. The optimisation demonstrated that under cruise conditions it is possible to have compact nacelle designs that offer reductions in drag. For example, a nacelle with a 23% reduction in length resulted in a 22% reduction in nacelle drag. However, these compact designs are more sensitive to off design condition. Specifically the spillage drag at a required drag rise Mach number of 0.87 could be 9 times higher for the reduced length nacelle. Nonetheless, it is possible to create a nacelle at the shortest length tested which had spillage of less than 6% of the cruise drag and met all requirements on drag rise to cruise at a Mach number of 0.85. This was enabled by an increase in the trailing edge radius such that it was equal to the highlight radius which improved the wave drag characteristics. Whilst the shortened nacelle was viable at low incidence, the increased wave drag resulted in the drag benefit relative to the conventional design being negated by an incidence of 6 degrees. In addition, this reduced length nacelle experienced separation at the end of runway windmill condition at 22 degrees, which is below the requirement of 30 degrees. Once installed on an aircraft the impact of reducing the nacelle length was a decrease in overall cruise aircraft drag of 3%. These studies demonstrate that there is a significant cruise benefit available from a short nacelle but that the off design conditions, most notably windmill requirements, will need to be addressed