This paper seeks to defend United States intervention in states that violate international human rights law. To explain the modem framework behind the legal justifications for intervention, it is necessary to review the historical development of international human rights law, the concept of sovereignty, and the continuing conflict between the two principles
Scholarly debates for and against military humanitarian intervention have raged on. For non-interven...
This article seeks to reconcile the notion of Humanitarian Intervention with that of sovereignty wit...
The paper explores the status of unilateral humanitarian interventions in international law. The Uni...
This paper seeks to defend United States intervention in states that violate international human rig...
Intervention in the domestic affairs of sovereign states by other sovereign state(s) is one of the ‘...
This Note examines the legality of humanitarian intervention by tracing the historical justification...
This paper is an attempt to establish a legitimate basis for humanitarian intervention in a world of...
The repeated failure of the United Nations Charter regime to respond to humanitarian crises— and to ...
This article\u27s purpose is not to search for particular conclusions as to the substantive merit or...
As the international response to recent events in Darfur demonstrates, the restriction of authority ...
The study which follows considers the current approach to State sovereignty, use of force, and human...
The lawfulness or legitimacy of external intervention in the internal affairs of sovereign state...
Human right violations are difficult to put to an end since in many cases the state itself is the on...
The concept of humanitarian intervention evolved as a subset of laws that govern the use of force an...
Since the end of the Cold War, the debate on humanitarian interventions has gained strength. The leg...
Scholarly debates for and against military humanitarian intervention have raged on. For non-interven...
This article seeks to reconcile the notion of Humanitarian Intervention with that of sovereignty wit...
The paper explores the status of unilateral humanitarian interventions in international law. The Uni...
This paper seeks to defend United States intervention in states that violate international human rig...
Intervention in the domestic affairs of sovereign states by other sovereign state(s) is one of the ‘...
This Note examines the legality of humanitarian intervention by tracing the historical justification...
This paper is an attempt to establish a legitimate basis for humanitarian intervention in a world of...
The repeated failure of the United Nations Charter regime to respond to humanitarian crises— and to ...
This article\u27s purpose is not to search for particular conclusions as to the substantive merit or...
As the international response to recent events in Darfur demonstrates, the restriction of authority ...
The study which follows considers the current approach to State sovereignty, use of force, and human...
The lawfulness or legitimacy of external intervention in the internal affairs of sovereign state...
Human right violations are difficult to put to an end since in many cases the state itself is the on...
The concept of humanitarian intervention evolved as a subset of laws that govern the use of force an...
Since the end of the Cold War, the debate on humanitarian interventions has gained strength. The leg...
Scholarly debates for and against military humanitarian intervention have raged on. For non-interven...
This article seeks to reconcile the notion of Humanitarian Intervention with that of sovereignty wit...
The paper explores the status of unilateral humanitarian interventions in international law. The Uni...