Marc Rohr, The Ongoing Mystery of the Limited Public Forum, 33 Nova Law Review 299 (2009). More than 25 years after setting forth the rules of its First Amendment “public forum” doctrine, the U.S. Supreme Court has yet to make clear the legal significance of the term “limited public forum,” or to provide a coherent, consistent explanation of how courts are supposed to evaluate restrictions on speaker access to such forums. This Article, in an effort to clarify the meaning of this concept, explores its treatment at both the Supreme Court and lower court levels, pointing out the difficulties inherent in the concept and suggesting a proper understanding thereof
When discussing the issue of transparency at the United States Supreme Court, most commentators focu...
The Information Superhighway, officially called the National Information Infrastructure (NII), exist...
The growing prevalence of privately-owned social media platforms is changing the way Americans and t...
This Note argues that the Supreme Court, beginning with Perry, has defined the limited public forum ...
In 1972, the United States Supreme Court introduced for the first time the concept of the public fo...
Streets, parks, and similar places traditionally used for purposes of discussion and assembly are pu...
When dealing with First Amendment free speech issues in the context of public libraries, courts have...
The public forum doctrine protects a right of access - “First Amendment easements” - to streets and ...
This paper introduces and explores the concept of forum delegation: the power of government official...
Social media have the potential to revolutionize discourse between American citizens and their gover...
Since its inception, the public forum doctrine has maintained a byzantine existence. The Supreme Cou...
When faced with organized protest against governmental policies, groups controlling governmental pro...
In its landmark decision in City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, the United States Supreme Court u...
Between the extremes of no interactivity and complete interactivity, it is difficult to predict whet...
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states, “Congress shall make no law . . . abri...
When discussing the issue of transparency at the United States Supreme Court, most commentators focu...
The Information Superhighway, officially called the National Information Infrastructure (NII), exist...
The growing prevalence of privately-owned social media platforms is changing the way Americans and t...
This Note argues that the Supreme Court, beginning with Perry, has defined the limited public forum ...
In 1972, the United States Supreme Court introduced for the first time the concept of the public fo...
Streets, parks, and similar places traditionally used for purposes of discussion and assembly are pu...
When dealing with First Amendment free speech issues in the context of public libraries, courts have...
The public forum doctrine protects a right of access - “First Amendment easements” - to streets and ...
This paper introduces and explores the concept of forum delegation: the power of government official...
Social media have the potential to revolutionize discourse between American citizens and their gover...
Since its inception, the public forum doctrine has maintained a byzantine existence. The Supreme Cou...
When faced with organized protest against governmental policies, groups controlling governmental pro...
In its landmark decision in City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, the United States Supreme Court u...
Between the extremes of no interactivity and complete interactivity, it is difficult to predict whet...
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states, “Congress shall make no law . . . abri...
When discussing the issue of transparency at the United States Supreme Court, most commentators focu...
The Information Superhighway, officially called the National Information Infrastructure (NII), exist...
The growing prevalence of privately-owned social media platforms is changing the way Americans and t...