On January 15th of this year, Russia became the last of the 47 member states of the Council of Europe to ratify Protocol 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which will now allow the long-awaited reform of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to begin. This commentary explores two basic questions: Why did Russia not ratify Protocol 14 for such a long time? And why has it now decided to ratify it after four years of delay
The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter – the Conven...
In his latest CEPS Commentary, Michael Emerson speculates that circumstances are propitious for a ne...
INTRODUCTION. The paper demonstrates that the problem of implementing judgments of the European Cour...
Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect, edited by Mälksoo and Benedek,...
This article is an adaptation of a lecture given at St. Antony\u27s College, Oxford on 5 July 2003 i...
With a focus on the Russian Federation, this article examines the adoption by the Council of Europe ...
Russia has been a member of the Council of Europe (CoE) for 25 years, and of the European Convention...
Why has there been a human rights backlash in Russia despite the country having been part of the Eur...
After the highly controversial YUKOS judgment of 19 January 2017, on 23 May 2017 the Constitutional ...
The paper was written to analyse the enforceability of the judgements of the European Court of Human...
This Note examines two of Russia\u27s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECH...
Summary and Conclusion Under the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms St...
Russia eagerly ratified the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 1998. Twenty years later, ...
This Note examines two of Russia\u27s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECH...
INTRODUCTION. The article examines problematic issues of Russia’s participation in the European Conv...
The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter – the Conven...
In his latest CEPS Commentary, Michael Emerson speculates that circumstances are propitious for a ne...
INTRODUCTION. The paper demonstrates that the problem of implementing judgments of the European Cour...
Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect, edited by Mälksoo and Benedek,...
This article is an adaptation of a lecture given at St. Antony\u27s College, Oxford on 5 July 2003 i...
With a focus on the Russian Federation, this article examines the adoption by the Council of Europe ...
Russia has been a member of the Council of Europe (CoE) for 25 years, and of the European Convention...
Why has there been a human rights backlash in Russia despite the country having been part of the Eur...
After the highly controversial YUKOS judgment of 19 January 2017, on 23 May 2017 the Constitutional ...
The paper was written to analyse the enforceability of the judgements of the European Court of Human...
This Note examines two of Russia\u27s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECH...
Summary and Conclusion Under the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms St...
Russia eagerly ratified the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 1998. Twenty years later, ...
This Note examines two of Russia\u27s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECH...
INTRODUCTION. The article examines problematic issues of Russia’s participation in the European Conv...
The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter – the Conven...
In his latest CEPS Commentary, Michael Emerson speculates that circumstances are propitious for a ne...
INTRODUCTION. The paper demonstrates that the problem of implementing judgments of the European Cour...