Add to ORKGThis paper examines deficiencies in the trial of Japanese war criminals after World War Two. The judges on the bench and the procedures used in the trial were biased against the Japanese defendants. The law on the subject was interpreted by the victor nations with no debate possible from the defense. There were also notable omissions from the list of people indicted. These factors resulted in the punishment of the Japanese but not in justice.Honors CollegeThesis (B.?
In the aftermath of World War II, Australia undertook domestic trials of suspected Japanese war crim...
The Australian war crimes trials conducted at Manus Island in 1950–1951 were carefully selected to p...
Reviewing Justice at War: The Story of the Japanese American Internment Cases, by Peter Irons (1983)
Between April 29, 1946 and November 12, 1948 the International Military Tribunal for the Far East c...
The second World War raged on from 1937 (1939 in Europe) until the surrender of the Japanese in Sept...
Beginning in late 1945, the United States, Britain, China, Australia, France, the Netherlands, and l...
The aim of this new collection of essays is to engage in analysis beyond the familiar victor’s justi...
This dissertation explores the inner-workings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far Eas...
This paper examines the evolution of the doctrine of conspiracy during the course of the trial at th...
Winner of the 2017 Library Award for Undergraduate ResearchAn exploration of the role of the U.S.’s ...
Until comparatively recently (see, eg., The Other Nuremberg by Arnold C. Brackman, 1987) there has b...
As World War II drew to a close in Europe, the victorious Allies faced the question of what to do wi...
Those tried for crimes against humanity have often been usurpers of State power, or committed crimes...
Abstract Tokyo Trial is a historical TV series on the International Military Tribunal for the Far Ea...
As the first mass atrocity trial following World War II, The Hadamar War Crimes Trial established pr...
In the aftermath of World War II, Australia undertook domestic trials of suspected Japanese war crim...
The Australian war crimes trials conducted at Manus Island in 1950–1951 were carefully selected to p...
Reviewing Justice at War: The Story of the Japanese American Internment Cases, by Peter Irons (1983)
Between April 29, 1946 and November 12, 1948 the International Military Tribunal for the Far East c...
The second World War raged on from 1937 (1939 in Europe) until the surrender of the Japanese in Sept...
Beginning in late 1945, the United States, Britain, China, Australia, France, the Netherlands, and l...
The aim of this new collection of essays is to engage in analysis beyond the familiar victor’s justi...
This dissertation explores the inner-workings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far Eas...
This paper examines the evolution of the doctrine of conspiracy during the course of the trial at th...
Winner of the 2017 Library Award for Undergraduate ResearchAn exploration of the role of the U.S.’s ...
Until comparatively recently (see, eg., The Other Nuremberg by Arnold C. Brackman, 1987) there has b...
As World War II drew to a close in Europe, the victorious Allies faced the question of what to do wi...
Those tried for crimes against humanity have often been usurpers of State power, or committed crimes...
Abstract Tokyo Trial is a historical TV series on the International Military Tribunal for the Far Ea...
As the first mass atrocity trial following World War II, The Hadamar War Crimes Trial established pr...
In the aftermath of World War II, Australia undertook domestic trials of suspected Japanese war crim...
The Australian war crimes trials conducted at Manus Island in 1950–1951 were carefully selected to p...
Reviewing Justice at War: The Story of the Japanese American Internment Cases, by Peter Irons (1983)