The utility of PET imaging in the diagnosis and management of psychosis: a brief review

Abstract Purpose Advances in the pathophysiological characterization of psychosis has led to a newfound role of biomarkers in diagnostic and prognostic contexts. Further, advances in the accuracy and sensitivity of nuclear medicine imaging techniques, and specifically positron emission tomography (PET), have improved the ability to diagnose and manage individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis or those at greater risk for developing psychosis. Methods Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science to identify papers related to the use of PET imaging in the diagnosis or management of psychosis. Search terms used included “positron emission tomography”, “PET imaging”, “psychosis”, “disorders of psychosis”, “schizophrenia”, “biomarkers”, “diagnostic biomarkers”, “prognostic biomarker”, “monitoring biomarker”, “outcome biomarker”, and “predictive biomarker.” Results Studies included fell into three categories: those examining microglia, those studying dopamine synthesis capacity, and those examining acetylcholine receptor activity. Microglial imaging has been shown to be ineffective in all patients with psychosis, but some believe it shows promise in a subset of patients with psychosis, although no defining characteristics of said subset have been postulated. Studies of dopamine synthesis capacity suggest that presynaptic dopamine is reliably elevated in patients with psychosis, but levels of dopamine active transporter are not. Further, positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F]fluoro- l -dihydroxyphenylalanine ([ 18 F]FDOPA)-PET has been recently used successfully as a predictive biomarker of dopaminergic treatment response, although more work is needed to validate such findings. Finally, existing studies have also documented lower levels of binding to the α7 nicotinic cholinergic receptor (α7-nAChR) via [ 18 F]-ASEM PET in patients with psychosis, however there is a dearth of prospective, randomized studies evaluating the efficacy of [ 18 F]-ASEM as a diagnostic or monitoring biomarker of any kind. Conclusion Molecular imaging has become a useful tool in the diagnosis and management of psychosis. Further work must be done to improve the comparative prognostic value and diagnostic accuracy of different radiotracers