Effect of artificial tears on dynamic optical quality in patients with dry eye disease

International audienceBackground: In clinical practice, fluctuating vision or decreased quality of vision is a common complaint in DED patients. Our study was designed to investigate the change in dynamic optical quality in dry eye patients after the use of artificial tears.Methods: Fifty-nine patients with dry eye disease (DED) and 31 control subjects were included in this prospective case-control study. There was no significant difference in age and sex between these two groups (P = 0.342, P = 0.847, respectively). Clinical evaluation of the ocular surface included Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear film break-up time (TBUT), lipid layer thickness (LLT), and Schirmer I test. DED patients were divided into two groups, mild (31 patients) and severe (28 patients). The optical quality of the tear film was measured with the Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS) using the mean objective scatter index (mean OSI), standard deviation of objective scatter index (SD-OSI) and modulation transfer function cut-off (MTF cut-off). After baseline examinations, one drop of artificial tears (ATs, carboxymethylcellulose ophthalmic solution, 0.5%) was instilled in both eyes, and optical quality parameters were measured again at 5 and 30 min following application of ATs.Results: At baseline, the mean OSI was higher in the DED group (0.95 ± 0.54) than in controls (0.54 ± 0.23, P < 0.001). The SD-OSI was also significantly increased in DED patients (0.44 ± 0.71) compared to control subjects (0.12 ± 0.06, P = 0.003). Five minutes after AT instillation, mean OSI and SD-OSI decreased significantly in severe DED patients (P = 0.044; P = 0.018), remained unchanged in mild DED patients, and increased in the control group (P = 0.019; P < 0.001). Thirty minutes after AT instillation, no significant difference in optical quality parameters was observed among the three groups.Conclusion: The effect of ATs on optical quality in patients with DED may differ according to the severity of the disease. Measurement of optical quality might be a promising tool to evaluate the effects of various ATs and possibly individualize treatment in DED patients