Late Jewish Literary Aramaic: Some considerations about the Aramaic language of Targum Pseudo-Jonathan

En la historia de la lengua aramea, ¿cuál es la posición exacta del Targum Pseudo-Jonatán? Este artícula presenta el estado de la cuestión en el debate sobre la lengua del Targum Pseudo-Jonatán y, a continuación, estudia el texto de Pseudo-Jonatán de Gn 41: “José interpreta el sueño del faraón”, comparándolo con el texto arameo de Ónquelos, Neófiti y la versión siríaca peshitta. Las conclusiones presentan las características principales de la lengua aramea de Ps-Jon de Gn41, de manera que constituyen una aportación importante a la descripción del arameo literario judío tardío.In the history of the Aramaic Language, what is the exact position of Targum Pseudo-Jonathan? This paper presents the status quaestionis in the debate about the language of Targum Pseudo-Jonathan and then analyzes the text of Pseudo-Jonathan of Gn 41: “Yosef’s interpretation of Pharaoh’s dream” in comparison with the text of Onqelos, Neofiti and the Syriac Peshitta. The conclusions summarize the nature of the Aramaic dialect of Targum Pseudo-Jonathan as it is employed in chapter 41 of Gn.In the history of the Aramaic Language, what is the exact position of Targum Pseudo-Jonathan? This paper presents the status quaestionis in the debate about the language of Targum Pseudo-Jonathan and then analyzes the text of Pseudo-Jonathan of Gn 41: “Yosef’s interpretation of Pharaoh’s dream” in comparison with the text of Onqelos, Neofiti and the Syriac Peshitta. The conclusions summarize the nature of the Aramaic dialect of Targum Pseudo-Jonathan as it is employed in chapter 41 of Gn