Dialogue is fundamental to argumentation, providing a dialectical basis for establishing which arguments are acceptable. Argumentation can also be used as the basis for dialogue. In such ``argumentation-based'' dialogues, participants take part in an exchange of arguments, and the mechanisms of argumentation are used to establish what participants take to be acceptable at the end of the exchange. This chapter considers such dialogues, discussing the elements that are required in order to carry out argumentation-based dialogues, giving examples, and discussing open issues
Using tools like argument diagrams and profiles of dialogue, this paper studies a number of examples...
This paper presents an argumentation-based approach to deliberation, the process by which two or mor...
This chapter gives an overview of the history of formal argumentation in terms of a distinction betw...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...
Abstract Using tools like argument diagrams and profiles of dialogue, this paper studies a number of...
The paper starts from scepticism that all argumentation is dialogical or that all dialogue types are...
The escalation of disagreement into overt conflict in social interaction can be avoided, if disagree...
This volume focuses on dialogue and argumentation in contexts which are marked by truculence and dis...
A well-known ambiguity in the term 'argument' is that of argument as an inferential structure and ar...
Rather than the art of putting forward logically valid arguments leading to Truth, argumentation is ...
Over the past twenty years, the use of computational methods in the study of argumentation has been ...
Abstract. In the past few years there have been a number of propos-als for mechanisms for negotiatio...
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
Exposed disagreement is extremely rare in natural dialogue. Although informal argumentation features...
This paper uses the language of formal dialectics to explore how argumentation schemes and their cri...
Using tools like argument diagrams and profiles of dialogue, this paper studies a number of examples...
This paper presents an argumentation-based approach to deliberation, the process by which two or mor...
This chapter gives an overview of the history of formal argumentation in terms of a distinction betw...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...
Abstract Using tools like argument diagrams and profiles of dialogue, this paper studies a number of...
The paper starts from scepticism that all argumentation is dialogical or that all dialogue types are...
The escalation of disagreement into overt conflict in social interaction can be avoided, if disagree...
This volume focuses on dialogue and argumentation in contexts which are marked by truculence and dis...
A well-known ambiguity in the term 'argument' is that of argument as an inferential structure and ar...
Rather than the art of putting forward logically valid arguments leading to Truth, argumentation is ...
Over the past twenty years, the use of computational methods in the study of argumentation has been ...
Abstract. In the past few years there have been a number of propos-als for mechanisms for negotiatio...
In this paper, I present a dialogue game approach to the argumentation stage of a critical discussio...
Exposed disagreement is extremely rare in natural dialogue. Although informal argumentation features...
This paper uses the language of formal dialectics to explore how argumentation schemes and their cri...
Using tools like argument diagrams and profiles of dialogue, this paper studies a number of examples...
This paper presents an argumentation-based approach to deliberation, the process by which two or mor...
This chapter gives an overview of the history of formal argumentation in terms of a distinction betw...