We argue that the ethical case for instituting vaccine benefit programs is justified by 2 widely recognized values: (1) reducing overall harm from COVID-19 and (2) protecting disadvantaged individuals. We then explain why they do not coerce, exploit, wrongfully distort decision-making, corrupt vaccination's moral significance, wrong those who have already been vaccinated, or destroy willingness to become vaccinated. However, their cost impacts and their effects on public perception of vaccines should be evaluated
Vaccination involves the use of killed or attenuated microorganism or its antigenic component such a...
Introduction or background Vaccination decisions and policies present tensions between individual ri...
Clinical ethicists hold near consensus on the view that healthcare should be provided regardless of ...
We argue that the ethical case for instituting vaccine benefit programs is justified by 2 widely rec...
Etry into a million-dollar lottery for getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is Ohio’s offer to adults...
Monetary incentives to increase COVID-19 vaccinations are widely used. Even if they work, whether s...
Mandatory vaccination, including for COVID-19, can be ethically justified if the threat to public he...
The potential for vaccines to prevent the spread of infectious diseases is crucial for vaccination p...
Should people get vaccinated for the sake of others? What could ground—and limit—the normative claim...
Should people get vaccinated for the sake of others? What could ground—and limit—the normative claim...
We review the possibilities for and ethics of the use incentives and disincentives to increase vacci...
The issue of COVID-19 vaccine allocation is still highly controversial on the international as well ...
We provide ethical criteria to establish when vaccine mandates for healthcare workers are ethically...
Vaccination involves the use of killed or attenuated microorganism or its antigenic component such a...
Introduction or background Vaccination decisions and policies present tensions between individual ri...
Clinical ethicists hold near consensus on the view that healthcare should be provided regardless of ...
We argue that the ethical case for instituting vaccine benefit programs is justified by 2 widely rec...
Etry into a million-dollar lottery for getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is Ohio’s offer to adults...
Monetary incentives to increase COVID-19 vaccinations are widely used. Even if they work, whether s...
Mandatory vaccination, including for COVID-19, can be ethically justified if the threat to public he...
The potential for vaccines to prevent the spread of infectious diseases is crucial for vaccination p...
Should people get vaccinated for the sake of others? What could ground—and limit—the normative claim...
Should people get vaccinated for the sake of others? What could ground—and limit—the normative claim...
We review the possibilities for and ethics of the use incentives and disincentives to increase vacci...
The issue of COVID-19 vaccine allocation is still highly controversial on the international as well ...
We provide ethical criteria to establish when vaccine mandates for healthcare workers are ethically...
Vaccination involves the use of killed or attenuated microorganism or its antigenic component such a...
Introduction or background Vaccination decisions and policies present tensions between individual ri...
Clinical ethicists hold near consensus on the view that healthcare should be provided regardless of ...