We argue that, in addition to the positive effects and functionality of morality for interactions among in-group members as outlined in the target article, morality may also fuel aggression and conflict in interactions between morality-based out-groups. We summarize empirical evidence showing that negative cognitions, emotions, and behaviors are particularly likely to appear between out-groups with opposing moral convictions
This chapter builds on the needs-based model of reconciliation, which posits victim groups’ primary ...
Evolutionary theorists since Darwin have viewed morality as a system designed for altruism. However,...
Previous theory and research suggests that perceiving shared humanity with others should be a positi...
In this article, we argue that hostile behavior toward outgroups is not only accepted but is often p...
The discrepancy between ingroup favoritism and outgroup hostility is well established in social psyc...
The present research examined observers\u27 moral judgments of groups in conflict. Study 1 found sup...
The current research integrates theories of morality and social identity in order to identify the wa...
An observational, cross-cultural study and an experimental study assessed behaviors indicative of a ...
Intergroup conflict encompasses a broad range of situations with moral relevance. Researchers at the...
Evolutionary explanations of the co-existence of large-scale cooperation and warfare in human societ...
The research investigated perceivers ’ inferences about the morality of target persons who engaged i...
In recent debates, morality or social norms have been proposed as an instrument to reduce conflict b...
Understanding motivations underlying acts of hatred are essential for developing strategies to preve...
This paper systematically reviews the empirical literature on the morality of children and adolescen...
In this position paper, we provide an overview of what we regard as the most important features of t...
This chapter builds on the needs-based model of reconciliation, which posits victim groups’ primary ...
Evolutionary theorists since Darwin have viewed morality as a system designed for altruism. However,...
Previous theory and research suggests that perceiving shared humanity with others should be a positi...
In this article, we argue that hostile behavior toward outgroups is not only accepted but is often p...
The discrepancy between ingroup favoritism and outgroup hostility is well established in social psyc...
The present research examined observers\u27 moral judgments of groups in conflict. Study 1 found sup...
The current research integrates theories of morality and social identity in order to identify the wa...
An observational, cross-cultural study and an experimental study assessed behaviors indicative of a ...
Intergroup conflict encompasses a broad range of situations with moral relevance. Researchers at the...
Evolutionary explanations of the co-existence of large-scale cooperation and warfare in human societ...
The research investigated perceivers ’ inferences about the morality of target persons who engaged i...
In recent debates, morality or social norms have been proposed as an instrument to reduce conflict b...
Understanding motivations underlying acts of hatred are essential for developing strategies to preve...
This paper systematically reviews the empirical literature on the morality of children and adolescen...
In this position paper, we provide an overview of what we regard as the most important features of t...
This chapter builds on the needs-based model of reconciliation, which posits victim groups’ primary ...
Evolutionary theorists since Darwin have viewed morality as a system designed for altruism. However,...
Previous theory and research suggests that perceiving shared humanity with others should be a positi...