This paper inquires into the justification of testimonial beliefs and attempts to resolve a dilemma for reductionist and anti-reductionist theories of testimonial justification recently proposed by John Greco. Specifically, the paper purports to demonstrate that Greco's Craigean solution to the dilemma is flawed and put forth an alternative solution that includes all the advantages of Greco's approach and avoids its weaknesses by appealing to the role of pragmatic factors in the attribution of testimonial justification
According to epistemic internalists, facts about justification supervene upon one's internal reasons...
The etiology of a perceptual belief can seemingly affect its epistemic status. There are cases in wh...
The main question discussed in current debates about the epistemology of testimony concerns whether ...
The problem of explaining how we acquire knowledge via testimony gives rise to a dilemma, according ...
This paper defends reductionism about testimonial justification of beliefs against two influential a...
This paper defends reductionism about testimonial justification of beliefs against two influential a...
John Greco believes that any satisfactory theory of testimonial knowledge should explain its practic...
In this paper I consider whether the reasons on which our testimonial beliefs are directly based—“te...
The paper is concerned with the epistemological status of testimony and the question of what may con...
The motivation for adopting reductive and anti-reductive theories of testimonial warrant is consider...
1The true and faithful testimony Abstract The present paper tries to shed new light upon the idea ...
There is an emerging skepticism about the existence of testimonial knowledge-how (Hawley in Stud His...
There is an emerging skepticism about the existence of testimonial knowledge-how :387–404, 2010; Pos...
O reducionismo como uma abordagem à epistemologia do testemunho faz certas exigências àquele que rec...
There are currently two robust traditions in philosophy dealing with doxastic attitudes: the traditi...
According to epistemic internalists, facts about justification supervene upon one's internal reasons...
The etiology of a perceptual belief can seemingly affect its epistemic status. There are cases in wh...
The main question discussed in current debates about the epistemology of testimony concerns whether ...
The problem of explaining how we acquire knowledge via testimony gives rise to a dilemma, according ...
This paper defends reductionism about testimonial justification of beliefs against two influential a...
This paper defends reductionism about testimonial justification of beliefs against two influential a...
John Greco believes that any satisfactory theory of testimonial knowledge should explain its practic...
In this paper I consider whether the reasons on which our testimonial beliefs are directly based—“te...
The paper is concerned with the epistemological status of testimony and the question of what may con...
The motivation for adopting reductive and anti-reductive theories of testimonial warrant is consider...
1The true and faithful testimony Abstract The present paper tries to shed new light upon the idea ...
There is an emerging skepticism about the existence of testimonial knowledge-how (Hawley in Stud His...
There is an emerging skepticism about the existence of testimonial knowledge-how :387–404, 2010; Pos...
O reducionismo como uma abordagem à epistemologia do testemunho faz certas exigências àquele que rec...
There are currently two robust traditions in philosophy dealing with doxastic attitudes: the traditi...
According to epistemic internalists, facts about justification supervene upon one's internal reasons...
The etiology of a perceptual belief can seemingly affect its epistemic status. There are cases in wh...
The main question discussed in current debates about the epistemology of testimony concerns whether ...