Between 1671 and 1716, the German mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz attempted to design a reckoning machine. Working closely with the Parisian clockmaker Monsieur Ollivier, Leibniz eventually failed at producing a working prototype. After the rediscovery of the machine’s last model in 1879, this failure was usually attributed either to their time’s technology—supposedly not advanced enough for Leibniz’s genius—, or to communication problems between the mathematician and the artisan. Along his correspondence, Leibniz left a bounteous collection of texts and schematics dedicated to the technical specification of his envisioned machine. In his own words, this “arithmetic instrument” aimed at “transplanting” human mind into “inanimate mat...
The story concerning the edition of Leibniz’s papers and letters renders the story of its reception ...
Leibniz may be considered as the first computer scientist. He made major contributions to engineerin...
Christian Wolff's failed attempt to appropriate Leibniz's distinction between machines of nature and...
Between 1672 and 1694, the German mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) attempted to d...
Throughout his life, Leibniz showed serious interest in the construction of clocks and actively cont...
During his stay in Paris, Leibniz read, annotated and commented on Edme Mariotte ’s Traité de la per...
International audienceThe aim of this paper is to explore some aspects of the connection between mat...
Between 1675 and 1676, while in Paris, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) got privileged access t...
On ten loose handwritten folios dating back from April 1679, Leibniz gradually devised, in the cours...
The first collection of Leibniz's key writings on the binary system, newly translated, with many pre...
Modernity began in Leibnizs lifetime, arguably, and due to the efforts of a group of philosopher-sci...
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) was a universal genius, making original contributions to law, ...
Leibniz's idea of creation is best epitomized by a note written by him on the margin of his work ent...
The transition from the exclusive use of words to the predominant use of symbols in mathematics cont...
International audienceThis paper consists of three main sections. In the first section, we consider ...
The story concerning the edition of Leibniz’s papers and letters renders the story of its reception ...
Leibniz may be considered as the first computer scientist. He made major contributions to engineerin...
Christian Wolff's failed attempt to appropriate Leibniz's distinction between machines of nature and...
Between 1672 and 1694, the German mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) attempted to d...
Throughout his life, Leibniz showed serious interest in the construction of clocks and actively cont...
During his stay in Paris, Leibniz read, annotated and commented on Edme Mariotte ’s Traité de la per...
International audienceThe aim of this paper is to explore some aspects of the connection between mat...
Between 1675 and 1676, while in Paris, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) got privileged access t...
On ten loose handwritten folios dating back from April 1679, Leibniz gradually devised, in the cours...
The first collection of Leibniz's key writings on the binary system, newly translated, with many pre...
Modernity began in Leibnizs lifetime, arguably, and due to the efforts of a group of philosopher-sci...
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) was a universal genius, making original contributions to law, ...
Leibniz's idea of creation is best epitomized by a note written by him on the margin of his work ent...
The transition from the exclusive use of words to the predominant use of symbols in mathematics cont...
International audienceThis paper consists of three main sections. In the first section, we consider ...
The story concerning the edition of Leibniz’s papers and letters renders the story of its reception ...
Leibniz may be considered as the first computer scientist. He made major contributions to engineerin...
Christian Wolff's failed attempt to appropriate Leibniz's distinction between machines of nature and...