The last twenty years have brought antitrust back to the fore as a political issue of greater salience. Several booms and busts in the economy have highlighted the issue of corporate power in the economy and the political system. The growing influence and aggressiveness of the European Union and other jurisdictions’ competition laws have highlighted the relative retreat in the United States. Political movements in the United States have brought issues of corporate power and its abuse back into the public limelight and with them a greater political salience for antitrust in the election cycle of 2020
In its March 26, 2016 issue, The Economist magazine announced that America needs a giant dose of co...
This issue features Part II of the Antitrust Law Journal\u27s Symposium on Antitrust at the Millenni...
This Article argues for a paradigm shift in modern antitrust policy. Rather than being concerned exc...
The last twenty years have brought antitrust back to the fore as a political issue of greater salien...
The last twenty years have brought antitrust back to the fore as a political issue of greater salien...
In this moment of renewed political interest in antitrust, a widespread consensus has formed that an...
Critics have accused the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) and Trump-appointee-chaired Federal Trade...
Antitrust scholars frequently refer to an “ideological pendulum” to describe the rise and fall of tr...
Antitrust law stands at its most fluid and negotiable moment in a generation. The bipartisan consens...
This Article examines the roles of economics and politics in U.S. antitrust from several perspective...
This article, which was prepared for an ABA Antitrust Section Panel, discusses the role of ideology ...
The debate over the legitimate goals of antitrust is ceaseless and its practical resolution influenc...
Political environment has significant effects on the competitive environment offirms. In response to...
There is no need to document the revolution in antitrust that occurred in large part as a result of ...
Antitrust enforcement in the United States has declined since the 1960s. We investigate the politica...
In its March 26, 2016 issue, The Economist magazine announced that America needs a giant dose of co...
This issue features Part II of the Antitrust Law Journal\u27s Symposium on Antitrust at the Millenni...
This Article argues for a paradigm shift in modern antitrust policy. Rather than being concerned exc...
The last twenty years have brought antitrust back to the fore as a political issue of greater salien...
The last twenty years have brought antitrust back to the fore as a political issue of greater salien...
In this moment of renewed political interest in antitrust, a widespread consensus has formed that an...
Critics have accused the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) and Trump-appointee-chaired Federal Trade...
Antitrust scholars frequently refer to an “ideological pendulum” to describe the rise and fall of tr...
Antitrust law stands at its most fluid and negotiable moment in a generation. The bipartisan consens...
This Article examines the roles of economics and politics in U.S. antitrust from several perspective...
This article, which was prepared for an ABA Antitrust Section Panel, discusses the role of ideology ...
The debate over the legitimate goals of antitrust is ceaseless and its practical resolution influenc...
Political environment has significant effects on the competitive environment offirms. In response to...
There is no need to document the revolution in antitrust that occurred in large part as a result of ...
Antitrust enforcement in the United States has declined since the 1960s. We investigate the politica...
In its March 26, 2016 issue, The Economist magazine announced that America needs a giant dose of co...
This issue features Part II of the Antitrust Law Journal\u27s Symposium on Antitrust at the Millenni...
This Article argues for a paradigm shift in modern antitrust policy. Rather than being concerned exc...