Add to ORKGiPRAW has identified three larger buildings blocks that can guide the creation of the normative and operational framework for a regulation of LAWS. These blocks are (1) challenges to be addressed by a regulation, (2) the human element at the core of any regulation of LAWS, and (3) actual elements of the framework. iPRAW maintains the approach that a future regulation of LAWS should focus on the human element, especially human control in the use of force
To the extent there is any consensus among States, ban advocates, and ban skeptics regarding the reg...
Lethal autonomous weapon systems, or LAWS, are weapons that can select a target with the help of sen...
This policy brief speaks to the military effects of lethal autonomous weapons systems raised in the ...
This paper summarizes the recommendations by the International Panel on the Regulation of Autonomou...
From a ban to a soft-law mechanism, any potential international regulation of LAWS could not be impl...
The report finds that the leading characteristic of human-machine interaction should be that of huma...
This report focuses on the impact of ethical considerations on the principle of human control over w...
This report picks up considerations on human control from previous iPRAW reports, links them to IHL...
This iPRAW publication is a brief overview of the matter of verification for a legally binding, pot...
Broadening the scope of regulatory options (here: outside of the CCW), this working paper links iPRA...
The authors argue that in order for Germany to do justice to its claim of outlawing lethal autonomou...
The report looks at the implications of technological capabilities and limitations for the use of au...
The report focuses on the underlying techniques behind what is popularly known as Artifical Intellig...
This article considers the role of norms in the debate on autonomous weapons systems (AWS). It argue...
Lethal automated weapon systems (LAWS) are developed and deployed by a growing number of state and n...
To the extent there is any consensus among States, ban advocates, and ban skeptics regarding the reg...
Lethal autonomous weapon systems, or LAWS, are weapons that can select a target with the help of sen...
This policy brief speaks to the military effects of lethal autonomous weapons systems raised in the ...
This paper summarizes the recommendations by the International Panel on the Regulation of Autonomou...
From a ban to a soft-law mechanism, any potential international regulation of LAWS could not be impl...
The report finds that the leading characteristic of human-machine interaction should be that of huma...
This report focuses on the impact of ethical considerations on the principle of human control over w...
This report picks up considerations on human control from previous iPRAW reports, links them to IHL...
This iPRAW publication is a brief overview of the matter of verification for a legally binding, pot...
Broadening the scope of regulatory options (here: outside of the CCW), this working paper links iPRA...
The authors argue that in order for Germany to do justice to its claim of outlawing lethal autonomou...
The report looks at the implications of technological capabilities and limitations for the use of au...
The report focuses on the underlying techniques behind what is popularly known as Artifical Intellig...
This article considers the role of norms in the debate on autonomous weapons systems (AWS). It argue...
Lethal automated weapon systems (LAWS) are developed and deployed by a growing number of state and n...
To the extent there is any consensus among States, ban advocates, and ban skeptics regarding the reg...
Lethal autonomous weapon systems, or LAWS, are weapons that can select a target with the help of sen...
This policy brief speaks to the military effects of lethal autonomous weapons systems raised in the ...