Gonadotrophin stimulation reduces follicular fluid hormone concentrations and disrupts their quantitative association with cumulus cell mRNA.

RESEARCH QUESTION Do follicular fluid hormone concentrations and the mRNA expression of LHCG, FSH and androgen receptors, aromatase and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in cumulus granulosa cells differ in naturally matured and stimulated follicles? DESIGN Cross-sectional study involving 57 natural cycle IVF (NC-IVF) and 36 conventional gonadotrophin-stimulated IVF (cIVF) cycles performed between 2014 and 2016. cIVF was performed by ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists. Hormone concentrations were determined in the follicular fluid of the leading follicle, and mRNA concentrations were quantified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in RNA extracted from granulosa cells of the cumulus oophorus complex obtained from these fluids. RESULTS Follicular fluid hormone concentrations were significantly lower in cIVF compared with NC-IVF follicles. Median concentrations were 0.50 and 14.5 mIU/ml for LH (P < 0.001), 16.1 and 46.5 nmol/l for testosterone (P < 0.001), 1270 and 2675 nmol/l for oestradiol (P < 0.001), and 12.3 and 28.9 pmol/l for AMH (P < 0.001), respectively. In cumulus granulosa cells, mRNA concentrations for LH receptor, FSH receptor, androgen receptor, aromatase and AMH did not differ between cIVF and NC-IVF follicles. Several hormone and mRNA concentrations were quantitatively associated in natural cycles such as follicular fluid AMH and cumulus granulosa cells AMH RNA (r2 = 0.107, P = 0.013), follicular fluid testosterone and cumulus granulosa cell AMH RNA (r2 = 0.158, P = 0.002), follicular fluid oestradiol and cumulus granulosa cell AMH RNA (r2 = 0.105, P = 0.014) and follicular fluid oestradiol and aromatase (r2 = 0.113, P = 0.011). In contrast, these associations were not observed in stimulated cycles. CONCLUSION These findings indicate some effects of gonadotrophin stimulation on follicular physiology, which could be a cause for the previously suggested lower oocyte quality in cIVF compared with NC-IVF