The quality of drinking water differs across countries, so households show different levels of willingness to pay (WTP) to improve it, which is also influenced by their income levels. This study presents a meta-analysis using studies from 30 developed and developing countries, representing 4.7 billion inhabitants. At the international level, by standardizing these values (PPP) to international US dollars of 2011, developing countries show, on average, a greater WTP than developed countries relative to their income and an inverse correlation between their water footprint and their WTP. HIGHLIGHTS A comparative meta-analysis between developed and developing countries.; Developing countries are willing to pay more to improve their drinking wa...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...
FEEM Working Paper No. 24.2014We estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for better quality of tap water o...
This is a revised version of the CES working paper 2010.51, showing the robustness of the results us...