The secession of southern Sudan: Features of the American position and justifications

The problem of the south of the most dangerous and the longer the problems racial (ethnic) and conflict, regional identities, which the African continent, and the administrations of U.S. Successive power inside the White House positions and views of different and diverse, not even the leaders decided the current U.S. administration (the administration of President Obama (2009 2012) to develop the end of it by supporting the referendum of Southern Sudan, which was conducted on January 9, 2011 and its consequences, and was all the evidence pointing toward the south to secede with the support and the assignment by the United States of America, which is trying this research followed by the illustration across the entrance to a historic, three main areas: - Explain the first axis (the United States and the Machakos`s Agreement and the Peace law of Sudan) backgrounds American interest in the problem, attitudes and solutions provided by or supported by successive U.S. administrations, and was the most important agreement Machakos and the American Peace law of Sudan declared in 2002, which gave the right to self-determination for the south, which was approved by the government Sudanese. - the second axis declared (the relationship between the ruling partners in Sudan and the U.S. position) kinds of the evolving relationship between the ruling partners in Sudan after the war ended after the signing of the peace agreement between them in the year 2005 and the U.S. position from him. - the last theme Explained: (justification for the U.S. position on the separation of the south) features of the U.S. position and rationale in providing maximum support for the secession of southern Sudan