Intergroup conflict can be modeled as a two-level game of strategy in which prosociality can take the form of trust and cooperation within groups or between groups. We review recent work, from our own laboratory and that of others, that shows how biological and sociocultural mechanisms that promote prosocial preferences and beliefs create in-group bounded, parochial cooperation, and, sometimes, parochial competition. We show when and how parochial cooperation and competition intensify rather than mitigate intergroup conflict.Social decision makin
Aggressive interactions between groups are frequent in human societies and can bear significant fitn...
In intergroup conflict, individual cooperation may be directed at strengthening the ingroup, thus un...
We investigate parochial altruism, the combination of in-group altruism and out-group hostility, in ...
Intergroup conflict can be modeled as a two-level game of strategy in which prosociality can take th...
Prior research on the participation in intergroup conflict suggests that prosocial individuals are p...
Peer competition and peer cooperation can be intuitively seen as opposing phenomena. However, depend...
In intergroup settings, humans often contribute to their in-group at a personal cost. Such parochial...
Engaging in personally costly within-group cooperation benefits one’s in-group members but also impa...
This dissertation investigates when people in intergroup conflicts will display universal versus par...
Human intergroup interactions can be peaceful, marked by mutually beneficial exchange and trade, but...
Peaceful intergroup relations deteriorate when individuals engage in parochialcooperation and paroch...
Understanding the ultimate and proximate mechanisms that favour cooperation remains one of the great...
The scale of human cooperation and conflict is outstanding and evolutionarily challenging to expla...
Humans have a stunning capacity for cooperation yet, at the same time, create and escalate conflict ...
Parochial altruism is decomposed in a tendency to benefit the in-group along with a tendency to igno...
Aggressive interactions between groups are frequent in human societies and can bear significant fitn...
In intergroup conflict, individual cooperation may be directed at strengthening the ingroup, thus un...
We investigate parochial altruism, the combination of in-group altruism and out-group hostility, in ...
Intergroup conflict can be modeled as a two-level game of strategy in which prosociality can take th...
Prior research on the participation in intergroup conflict suggests that prosocial individuals are p...
Peer competition and peer cooperation can be intuitively seen as opposing phenomena. However, depend...
In intergroup settings, humans often contribute to their in-group at a personal cost. Such parochial...
Engaging in personally costly within-group cooperation benefits one’s in-group members but also impa...
This dissertation investigates when people in intergroup conflicts will display universal versus par...
Human intergroup interactions can be peaceful, marked by mutually beneficial exchange and trade, but...
Peaceful intergroup relations deteriorate when individuals engage in parochialcooperation and paroch...
Understanding the ultimate and proximate mechanisms that favour cooperation remains one of the great...
The scale of human cooperation and conflict is outstanding and evolutionarily challenging to expla...
Humans have a stunning capacity for cooperation yet, at the same time, create and escalate conflict ...
Parochial altruism is decomposed in a tendency to benefit the in-group along with a tendency to igno...
Aggressive interactions between groups are frequent in human societies and can bear significant fitn...
In intergroup conflict, individual cooperation may be directed at strengthening the ingroup, thus un...
We investigate parochial altruism, the combination of in-group altruism and out-group hostility, in ...