Add to ORKGThe scope of pretrial discovery in the United States (“U.S.”) is the most expansive of any common law country in the world. At the outset of civil litigation in the U.S., opposing parties are required to provide one another with allnonprivileged information that is relevant to their claims or defenses. This discoverable information often includes personal information or data, such as names and addresses, of individuals. This facet of expansive, and at times intrusive, discovery is a hallmark of the American legal system and is grounded in the principle that there should not be many surprises in the course of a lawsuit. The Supreme Court opined that “[m]utual knowledge of all relevant facts gathered by both parties is essential to proper lit...
This is an article about solving the problem of expensive electronic discovery in litigation by simp...
In the interpretation and application of the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Proc...
This Note argues that the Second Circuit\u27s interpretation of Section 1782 should become the stand...
The scope of pretrial discovery in the United States (“U.S.”) is the most expansive of any common la...
U.S. Courts generally prefer applying the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure over The Hague Evidence C...
Wide-ranging pretrial discovery is an integral part of contemporaryAmerican civil litigation, partic...
This Article presents the first comprehensive study of an intriguing and increasingly pervasive prac...
Parties litigant desire to obtain before trial all possible information relevant to the matter in is...
This article compares and contrasts the pre-trial discovery mechanisms used in China and the United ...
This Issue Brief explores an oft-neglected irony in international e-discovery: the rationales used b...
As the world grows smaller and nations become more interdependent, the likelihood that litigation wi...
U.S. law provides litigants with a variety of means to obtain evidence from foreign jurisdictions. T...
THE laws of procedure for state and federal courts in the United States permit each side in a disput...
In the modern era, the pretrial process is critical to the disposition of almost all litigation. The...
This note examines the international efforts undertaken by nations collectively and individually to ...
This is an article about solving the problem of expensive electronic discovery in litigation by simp...
In the interpretation and application of the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Proc...
This Note argues that the Second Circuit\u27s interpretation of Section 1782 should become the stand...
The scope of pretrial discovery in the United States (“U.S.”) is the most expansive of any common la...
U.S. Courts generally prefer applying the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure over The Hague Evidence C...
Wide-ranging pretrial discovery is an integral part of contemporaryAmerican civil litigation, partic...
This Article presents the first comprehensive study of an intriguing and increasingly pervasive prac...
Parties litigant desire to obtain before trial all possible information relevant to the matter in is...
This article compares and contrasts the pre-trial discovery mechanisms used in China and the United ...
This Issue Brief explores an oft-neglected irony in international e-discovery: the rationales used b...
As the world grows smaller and nations become more interdependent, the likelihood that litigation wi...
U.S. law provides litigants with a variety of means to obtain evidence from foreign jurisdictions. T...
THE laws of procedure for state and federal courts in the United States permit each side in a disput...
In the modern era, the pretrial process is critical to the disposition of almost all litigation. The...
This note examines the international efforts undertaken by nations collectively and individually to ...
This is an article about solving the problem of expensive electronic discovery in litigation by simp...
In the interpretation and application of the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Proc...
This Note argues that the Second Circuit\u27s interpretation of Section 1782 should become the stand...