Should pluralists be pluralists about pluralism?

Funder: studienstiftung des deutschen volkes; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004350Funder: Prins Bernhard CultuurfondsAbstractHow many correct logics are there? Monists endorse that there is one, pluralists argue for many, and nihilists claim that there are none. Reasoning about these views requires a logic. That is the meta-logic. It turns out that there are some meta-logical challenges specifically for the pluralists. I will argue that these depend on an implicitly assumed absoluteness of correct logic. Pluralists can solve the challenges by giving up on this absoluteness and instead adopt contextualism about correct logic. This contextualism is naturalistically appealing.