ABSTRACT Purpose: The purpose of this article is to review the optimal heart rate goal in patients with atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response and heart failure. Method: A PubMed literature search was conducted with search terms “lenient versus strict rate control”, “atrial fibrillation”, “heart failure”, and “rate control”. Results: There is a lack of evidence-based research on optimal heart rate goals in patients with atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response and heart failure. Studies that were performed did not come to a consensus and so there is no firm guideline in treating these patients. One study supported strict rate control to decrease mortality and another supported lenient rate control. Other studies show...
ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with succ...
Background: This study was conducted to compare rate- and rhythm-control therapy in patients with pe...
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare rate- and rhythm-control therapy in patients with pe...
Background: Rate control is often the therapy of choice for atrial fibrillation. Guidelines recommen...
It is unknown whether lenient rate control is an acceptable strategy in patients with AF and heart f...
AIMS: It is unknown whether lenient rate control is an acceptable strategy in patients with AF and h...
BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that rate control is an acceptable alternative for rhythm co...
BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that rate control is an acceptable alternative for rhythm co...
In the last few years, there has been a major shift in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in ...
Introduction Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart arrhythmia with a prevalence of approximat...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare rate- and rhythm-control therapy in patients with pe...
ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with succ...
Background: This study was conducted to compare rate- and rhythm-control therapy in patients with pe...
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare rate- and rhythm-control therapy in patients with pe...
Background: Rate control is often the therapy of choice for atrial fibrillation. Guidelines recommen...
It is unknown whether lenient rate control is an acceptable strategy in patients with AF and heart f...
AIMS: It is unknown whether lenient rate control is an acceptable strategy in patients with AF and h...
BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that rate control is an acceptable alternative for rhythm co...
BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated that rate control is an acceptable alternative for rhythm co...
In the last few years, there has been a major shift in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in ...
Introduction Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart arrhythmia with a prevalence of approximat...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
Objectives This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with suc...
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare rate- and rhythm-control therapy in patients with pe...
ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with succ...
Background: This study was conducted to compare rate- and rhythm-control therapy in patients with pe...
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare rate- and rhythm-control therapy in patients with pe...