This Note examines the impact of the 2018 landmark labor law case Janus v. AFSCME. Janus held it unconstitutional under the First Amendment to require public sector employees to pay fees to a union to which they are not a member. The Supreme Court based their decision on the idea that compelling public employees to subsidize union speech to which they disagreed violated their free speech rights. The author argues that the Court’s holding in Janus should be extended to protect the free speech rights of private sector employees through a finding of state action in the private unionized workplace
The economic crisis that began in 2008 led many states and localities to look for ways to reduce lab...
American labor unions have collapsed. Having once bargained for more than a third of American worker...
Many scholars and others have, for some time now, been calling attention to the alarming growth in p...
The Supreme Court in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council...
In Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (“AFSCME”), the Supreme Co...
In order for a union to represent a group of workers, a petition to start the election process must ...
Event Description Last year, in Janus v. AFSCME, a divided Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitu...
Unions today are under First Amendment fire, with the compelled speech doctrine as the weapon of cho...
In the days after the Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Janus v. AFSCME (2018)—a 5-4 conservat...
The importance of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, an...
American labor unions have collapsed. Having once bargained for more than a third of American worker...
This term, the U.S. Supreme Court in Janus v. AFSCME will decide the constitutional fate of fair-sha...
This paper explores public sector unions, unionized employee benefits, and public sector union membe...
In the spring of 1937 the respondent distributed anti-union literature to its employees. Some of the...
This term in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Ass’n, the Supreme Court will consider whether ordina...
The economic crisis that began in 2008 led many states and localities to look for ways to reduce lab...
American labor unions have collapsed. Having once bargained for more than a third of American worker...
Many scholars and others have, for some time now, been calling attention to the alarming growth in p...
The Supreme Court in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council...
In Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (“AFSCME”), the Supreme Co...
In order for a union to represent a group of workers, a petition to start the election process must ...
Event Description Last year, in Janus v. AFSCME, a divided Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitu...
Unions today are under First Amendment fire, with the compelled speech doctrine as the weapon of cho...
In the days after the Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Janus v. AFSCME (2018)—a 5-4 conservat...
The importance of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, an...
American labor unions have collapsed. Having once bargained for more than a third of American worker...
This term, the U.S. Supreme Court in Janus v. AFSCME will decide the constitutional fate of fair-sha...
This paper explores public sector unions, unionized employee benefits, and public sector union membe...
In the spring of 1937 the respondent distributed anti-union literature to its employees. Some of the...
This term in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Ass’n, the Supreme Court will consider whether ordina...
The economic crisis that began in 2008 led many states and localities to look for ways to reduce lab...
American labor unions have collapsed. Having once bargained for more than a third of American worker...
Many scholars and others have, for some time now, been calling attention to the alarming growth in p...