International audienceWe present a generalization of belief base revision to the multi-agent case. In our approach agents have belief bases containing both propositional beliefs and higher-order beliefs about their own beliefs and other agents’ beliefs. Moreover, their belief bases are split in two parts: the mutable part, whose elements may change under belief revision, and the core part, whose elements do not change. We study a belief revision operator inspired by the notion of screened revision. We provide complexity results of model checking for our approach as well as an optimal model checking algorithm. Moreover, we study complexity of epistemic planning formulated in the context of our framework
Intelligent agents require methods to revise their epistemic state as they acquire new information. ...
International audienceWe address the issue of belief revision in a multi-agent setting. We represent...
We refine our algebraic axiomatization in [A. Baltag, B. Coecke, M. Sadrzadeh, Epistemic actions as ...
International audienceWe present a generalization of belief base revision to the multi-agent case. I...
This paper presents both a semantic and a computational model for multi-agent belief revision. We sh...
This paper presents both a semantic and a computational model for multi-agent belief revision. We sh...
In modeling the knowledge processing structure of an Agent in a Multi-Agent world it becomes necessa...
In this paper, a framework of a belief revision agent in a multi-agent environment is presented. In ...
Belief revision is the process of rearranging a knowledge base to preserve global consistency whilst...
AbstractOne of the main challenges in the formal modeling of common-sense reasoning is the ability t...
Introduction The body of beliefs (facts and rules) accumulated in the course of time by a knowledge...
With the advance of robots and more intelligent computer programs, belief revision is becoming an in...
One of the main challenges in the formal modeling of common-sense reasoning is the ability to cope w...
We give a model for iterated belief change in multi-agent systems. The formal tool we use for this i...
AbstractWe refine our algebraic axiomatization in [A. Baltag, B. Coecke, M. Sadrzadeh, Epistemic act...
Intelligent agents require methods to revise their epistemic state as they acquire new information. ...
International audienceWe address the issue of belief revision in a multi-agent setting. We represent...
We refine our algebraic axiomatization in [A. Baltag, B. Coecke, M. Sadrzadeh, Epistemic actions as ...
International audienceWe present a generalization of belief base revision to the multi-agent case. I...
This paper presents both a semantic and a computational model for multi-agent belief revision. We sh...
This paper presents both a semantic and a computational model for multi-agent belief revision. We sh...
In modeling the knowledge processing structure of an Agent in a Multi-Agent world it becomes necessa...
In this paper, a framework of a belief revision agent in a multi-agent environment is presented. In ...
Belief revision is the process of rearranging a knowledge base to preserve global consistency whilst...
AbstractOne of the main challenges in the formal modeling of common-sense reasoning is the ability t...
Introduction The body of beliefs (facts and rules) accumulated in the course of time by a knowledge...
With the advance of robots and more intelligent computer programs, belief revision is becoming an in...
One of the main challenges in the formal modeling of common-sense reasoning is the ability to cope w...
We give a model for iterated belief change in multi-agent systems. The formal tool we use for this i...
AbstractWe refine our algebraic axiomatization in [A. Baltag, B. Coecke, M. Sadrzadeh, Epistemic act...
Intelligent agents require methods to revise their epistemic state as they acquire new information. ...
International audienceWe address the issue of belief revision in a multi-agent setting. We represent...
We refine our algebraic axiomatization in [A. Baltag, B. Coecke, M. Sadrzadeh, Epistemic actions as ...