No-free-lunch theorems have shown that learning algorithms cannot be universally good. We show that no free funch exists for noise prediction as well. We show that when the noise is additive and the prior over target functions is uniform, a prior on the noise distribution cannot be updated, in the Bayesian sense, from any finite data set. We emphasize the importance of a prior over the target function in order to justify superior performance for learning systems
The No Free Lunch (NFL) theorems for optimization tell us that when averaged over all possible optim...
It is generally assumed when using Bayesian inference methods for neural networks that the input dat...
We discuss more realistic models of computational learning. We extend the existing literature on the...
No-free-lunch theorems have shown that learning algorithms cannot be universally good. We show that ...
NOTE: Text or symbols not renderable in plain ASCII are indicated by [...]. Abstract is included in ...
The No Free Lunch theorems are often used to argue that domain specific knowledge is required to des...
AbstractThe present work employs a model of noise introduced earlier by the third author. In this mo...
Data analysis usually aims to identify a particular signal, such as an intervention effect. Conventi...
This paper is concerned with learners who aim to learn patterns in infinite binary sequences: shown ...
Data analysis usually aims to identify a particular signal, such as an intervention effect. Conventi...
This paper presents an approach to learning from noisy data that views the problem as one of reasoni...
AbstractWe study a procedure for estimating an upper bound of an unknown noise factor in the frequen...
The no-free-lunch theorems promote a skeptical conclusion that all possible machine learning algorit...
We discuss the no-free-lunch NFL theorem for supervised learning as a logical paradox—that is, as a ...
Abstract—Function optimisation is a major challenge in com-puter science. The No Free Lunch theorems...
The No Free Lunch (NFL) theorems for optimization tell us that when averaged over all possible optim...
It is generally assumed when using Bayesian inference methods for neural networks that the input dat...
We discuss more realistic models of computational learning. We extend the existing literature on the...
No-free-lunch theorems have shown that learning algorithms cannot be universally good. We show that ...
NOTE: Text or symbols not renderable in plain ASCII are indicated by [...]. Abstract is included in ...
The No Free Lunch theorems are often used to argue that domain specific knowledge is required to des...
AbstractThe present work employs a model of noise introduced earlier by the third author. In this mo...
Data analysis usually aims to identify a particular signal, such as an intervention effect. Conventi...
This paper is concerned with learners who aim to learn patterns in infinite binary sequences: shown ...
Data analysis usually aims to identify a particular signal, such as an intervention effect. Conventi...
This paper presents an approach to learning from noisy data that views the problem as one of reasoni...
AbstractWe study a procedure for estimating an upper bound of an unknown noise factor in the frequen...
The no-free-lunch theorems promote a skeptical conclusion that all possible machine learning algorit...
We discuss the no-free-lunch NFL theorem for supervised learning as a logical paradox—that is, as a ...
Abstract—Function optimisation is a major challenge in com-puter science. The No Free Lunch theorems...
The No Free Lunch (NFL) theorems for optimization tell us that when averaged over all possible optim...
It is generally assumed when using Bayesian inference methods for neural networks that the input dat...
We discuss more realistic models of computational learning. We extend the existing literature on the...