Add to ORKGIn this editorial, the author supports parents\u27 rights to censor what their children read but thinks they infringe on the rights of others when they attempt to restrict what others read. The author applauds the Salem-Keizer School District for its policy regarding reviewing challenged books and allowing alternate assigned readings for children
The author of this article sums up the events that happened at the meeting in Coos Bay about the fat...
Book Review: Not In Front of the Children, “Indecency,” Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth, Marj...
In the introduction, the article focuses on those rights of the reader (D. Pennac) that cannot be fu...
In this opinion piece the author states that parents have a right and duty to teach values to their ...
Suzanne Gallagher is the author of this Soapbox article that appeared in the Beaverton Valley Times ...
The reader argues three main points: one, it is the parents\u27 responsibility to decide what is app...
The author suggests it is important for parents to monitor what their children are reading but shoul...
David Culver cites his objections to the book Akbar & Jeff\u27s Guide to Life which was challenged...
In spite of the high number of challenges to books in Oregon libraries, few are removed from the she...
Opinion: Dissent is healthy and a right. Censorship is dangerous. Self censorship is acceptable, s...
The author of this editorial believes it is a parent\u27s responsibility to select materials for the...
Opposing Viewpoints articles, one by the chairman of the Bethel School Board, supporting the need t...
Tom Hall interviews Elizabeth Beairsto for National Library Week in this article. Beairsto had just ...
Tony Kneidek writes about the book challenges at the Reynolds School Districts. He says that we cann...
Two parents asked the West Linn-Wilsonville School District to ban the book Jumper from Bolton Mid...
The author of this article sums up the events that happened at the meeting in Coos Bay about the fat...
Book Review: Not In Front of the Children, “Indecency,” Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth, Marj...
In the introduction, the article focuses on those rights of the reader (D. Pennac) that cannot be fu...
In this opinion piece the author states that parents have a right and duty to teach values to their ...
Suzanne Gallagher is the author of this Soapbox article that appeared in the Beaverton Valley Times ...
The reader argues three main points: one, it is the parents\u27 responsibility to decide what is app...
The author suggests it is important for parents to monitor what their children are reading but shoul...
David Culver cites his objections to the book Akbar & Jeff\u27s Guide to Life which was challenged...
In spite of the high number of challenges to books in Oregon libraries, few are removed from the she...
Opinion: Dissent is healthy and a right. Censorship is dangerous. Self censorship is acceptable, s...
The author of this editorial believes it is a parent\u27s responsibility to select materials for the...
Opposing Viewpoints articles, one by the chairman of the Bethel School Board, supporting the need t...
Tom Hall interviews Elizabeth Beairsto for National Library Week in this article. Beairsto had just ...
Tony Kneidek writes about the book challenges at the Reynolds School Districts. He says that we cann...
Two parents asked the West Linn-Wilsonville School District to ban the book Jumper from Bolton Mid...
The author of this article sums up the events that happened at the meeting in Coos Bay about the fat...
Book Review: Not In Front of the Children, “Indecency,” Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth, Marj...
In the introduction, the article focuses on those rights of the reader (D. Pennac) that cannot be fu...