Add to ORKGThe motion by Vermont for leave to file a complaint invoking our original jurisdiction against New York and against International Paper Company, a New York corporation doing business in New York, is granted. New York and International Paper Co. are given until June 19, 1972, to answer the complaint
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further p...
Dear Bill, If you would consider substituting Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments for Sixth Amendment...
I regret that I again find myself unable to agree with the opinion and order circulated yesterday af...
On April 24, 1972, after oral argument, we granted Vermont\u27s motion to file a complaint against N...
This is a motion by Vermont for leave to file a complaint invoking our original jurisdiction against...
On April 24, 1972, after oral argument, we granted Vermont\u27s motion to file a complaint against N...
I agree with your dissent in this case and should appreciate your adding my name to your opinion
This is an appeal from the judgement of a three-judge federal court declaring unconstitutional and e...
Had Vermont sought leave to file only against International Paper, I would have no doubt that the Co...
This is an appeal from the judgment of a three-judge federal court declaring unconstitutional and en...
This is an appeal from the judgment of a three-judge federal court declarig unconstitutional and enj...
I agree with your proposed opinion in the above but suggest it be a signed rather than a Per Curiam ...
Per Curiam. Appellees commenced this action in the federal District Court for the Southern District ...
Dear Bill: Please join me in the three opinions you have circulated in these cases
Please join me in your opinion for the Court in No. 45, Washington v. General Motors Corporation, an...
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further p...
Dear Bill, If you would consider substituting Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments for Sixth Amendment...
I regret that I again find myself unable to agree with the opinion and order circulated yesterday af...
On April 24, 1972, after oral argument, we granted Vermont\u27s motion to file a complaint against N...
This is a motion by Vermont for leave to file a complaint invoking our original jurisdiction against...
On April 24, 1972, after oral argument, we granted Vermont\u27s motion to file a complaint against N...
I agree with your dissent in this case and should appreciate your adding my name to your opinion
This is an appeal from the judgement of a three-judge federal court declaring unconstitutional and e...
Had Vermont sought leave to file only against International Paper, I would have no doubt that the Co...
This is an appeal from the judgment of a three-judge federal court declaring unconstitutional and en...
This is an appeal from the judgment of a three-judge federal court declarig unconstitutional and enj...
I agree with your proposed opinion in the above but suggest it be a signed rather than a Per Curiam ...
Per Curiam. Appellees commenced this action in the federal District Court for the Southern District ...
Dear Bill: Please join me in the three opinions you have circulated in these cases
Please join me in your opinion for the Court in No. 45, Washington v. General Motors Corporation, an...
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further p...
Dear Bill, If you would consider substituting Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments for Sixth Amendment...
I regret that I again find myself unable to agree with the opinion and order circulated yesterday af...