Add to ORKGDear Chief:Although your assignment of this case to me indicated that you had tentatively determined it should be a signed opinion, the attached draft has at least the virtue of brevity, and makes little new law. I therefore suggest that if the draft becomes an opinion of the Court, it should be a per curiam rather than a signed opinion
I agree with your proposed opinion in the above but suggest it be a signed rather than a Per Curiam ...
I agree with your dissent in this case and should appreciate your adding my name to your opinion
John\u27s dissent suggests more problems with this case than I had fully appreciated and I am going ...
Dear Chief:Although your assignment of this case to me indicated that you had tentatively determined...
Dear Chief: I have read over your proposed oral announcement in this case, and it is entirely agreea...
Dear Bill: I agreed once with your opinion in 73-5768, FRANCISCO v. GATHRIGHT. I regret only that yo...
Dear Bill, I strongly prefer the second alternative suggested in your memorandum of today. Adoption ...
Dear Bill: I will be glad to join your Per Curiam opinion if you make changes along the lines indica...
Dear Bill: In view of the changes in your second draft, I am happy to join you Per Curiam
Dear Bill: In tardy response to your memorandum of February 3, I would be content with footnote two ...
Dear Lewis: When you first circulated your proposed disposition of this case, I wrote you that I wou...
Correspondence from Chief Justice Burger to Rehnquist indicating that he joins him
Dear Bill: This is in response to your memorandum of February 3. My preference, like yours, is the f...
Please join me in your opinion for the Court in No. 45, Washington v. General Motors Corporation, an...
Correspondence from Rehnquist to White agreeing with the proposed direction that he circulated
I agree with your proposed opinion in the above but suggest it be a signed rather than a Per Curiam ...
I agree with your dissent in this case and should appreciate your adding my name to your opinion
John\u27s dissent suggests more problems with this case than I had fully appreciated and I am going ...
Dear Chief:Although your assignment of this case to me indicated that you had tentatively determined...
Dear Chief: I have read over your proposed oral announcement in this case, and it is entirely agreea...
Dear Bill: I agreed once with your opinion in 73-5768, FRANCISCO v. GATHRIGHT. I regret only that yo...
Dear Bill, I strongly prefer the second alternative suggested in your memorandum of today. Adoption ...
Dear Bill: I will be glad to join your Per Curiam opinion if you make changes along the lines indica...
Dear Bill: In view of the changes in your second draft, I am happy to join you Per Curiam
Dear Bill: In tardy response to your memorandum of February 3, I would be content with footnote two ...
Dear Lewis: When you first circulated your proposed disposition of this case, I wrote you that I wou...
Correspondence from Chief Justice Burger to Rehnquist indicating that he joins him
Dear Bill: This is in response to your memorandum of February 3. My preference, like yours, is the f...
Please join me in your opinion for the Court in No. 45, Washington v. General Motors Corporation, an...
Correspondence from Rehnquist to White agreeing with the proposed direction that he circulated
I agree with your proposed opinion in the above but suggest it be a signed rather than a Per Curiam ...
I agree with your dissent in this case and should appreciate your adding my name to your opinion
John\u27s dissent suggests more problems with this case than I had fully appreciated and I am going ...