Add to ORKGAt conference I vote to hold this case for Delaware v. Van Arsdall, No. 84-1279. Although I still prefer that disposition, I wonder if you would consider making some changes in your per curiam so that I could join it. My suggestions are the following
John\u27s dissent suggests more problems with this case than I had fully appreciated and I am going ...
Dear Chief: This is a Per Curiam and following custom should be announced by you. I see no reason to...
Dear Chief: I am glad to join your per curiam as is, but I am afraid I would have difficulty in join...
I think your concerns may be satisfied by the following revisions to the circulating draft, which I ...
Dear Sandra, Thank you very much for your prompt reply to my letter. I am happy to join your opinion...
Dear Sandra: I agree with your Per Curiam. Bill Brennan\u27s suggestions may be helpful. But my join...
Dear Sandra: My original inclination was to hold this case for No. 84-1279, Delaware v. Van Arsdall....
I agree with your proposed opinion in the above but suggest it be a signed rather than a Per Curiam ...
Dear Bill, I join your per curiam opinion in this case. I am making a change or two in my concurrenc...
As the Court has granted cert on two Confrontation Clause cases, I think this case should be held. N...
Enclosed another try in light of various proposals received. It returns to what I proposed to the ...
With reference to the effective date of the judgment, Frank Lorson suggested the following language ...
I recommend you join the per curiam. I assume from the circulations that you\u27re still counted as ...
Dear Byron: Your proposed per curiam, circulated late Friday, convinces me, and I would now like to ...
I think JUSTICE BRENNAN\u27s opinion is very good and I recommend that you join it. It reflects your...
John\u27s dissent suggests more problems with this case than I had fully appreciated and I am going ...
Dear Chief: This is a Per Curiam and following custom should be announced by you. I see no reason to...
Dear Chief: I am glad to join your per curiam as is, but I am afraid I would have difficulty in join...
I think your concerns may be satisfied by the following revisions to the circulating draft, which I ...
Dear Sandra, Thank you very much for your prompt reply to my letter. I am happy to join your opinion...
Dear Sandra: I agree with your Per Curiam. Bill Brennan\u27s suggestions may be helpful. But my join...
Dear Sandra: My original inclination was to hold this case for No. 84-1279, Delaware v. Van Arsdall....
I agree with your proposed opinion in the above but suggest it be a signed rather than a Per Curiam ...
Dear Bill, I join your per curiam opinion in this case. I am making a change or two in my concurrenc...
As the Court has granted cert on two Confrontation Clause cases, I think this case should be held. N...
Enclosed another try in light of various proposals received. It returns to what I proposed to the ...
With reference to the effective date of the judgment, Frank Lorson suggested the following language ...
I recommend you join the per curiam. I assume from the circulations that you\u27re still counted as ...
Dear Byron: Your proposed per curiam, circulated late Friday, convinces me, and I would now like to ...
I think JUSTICE BRENNAN\u27s opinion is very good and I recommend that you join it. It reflects your...
John\u27s dissent suggests more problems with this case than I had fully appreciated and I am going ...
Dear Chief: This is a Per Curiam and following custom should be announced by you. I see no reason to...
Dear Chief: I am glad to join your per curiam as is, but I am afraid I would have difficulty in join...