Objective. This article will examine whether candidate sex impacts electoral outcomes in judicial elections. Methods. We examine the success of male and female candidates in contested, nonretention elections for state intermediate appellate courts (IACs) from 2000–2006 using OLS and logistic regression analysis. Results. We find that there is no systematic bias against women candidates in IAC races over this period. In fact, there is some evidence that women may actually perform slightly better than men. Conclusions. Contrary to the claims of some scholars, these results suggest judicial elections do not hinder diversity on the state appellate bench
The intersection of gender—and to a lesser extent, race—and political ambition has been the subject ...
Because voters rely on judicial performance evaluations when casting their ballots, it is important ...
My research focuses on determining what composition of a court will respond most favorably to women'...
This article will examine whether candidate sex impacts electoral outcomes in judicial elections. Co...
Women in the United States remain underrepresented in politics, both in the legislature and the judi...
What information do voters rely on in nonpartisan judicial election? When voters lack a partisan cue...
Objectives. To explore differences in the appointment and election method of se-lecting state high c...
A rampant supposition exists that the judicial nominations of females are less successful due to the...
Judge Sonia Sotomayor\u27s assertion that female judges might be better than male judges has gener...
This Article evaluates the success of female attorneys before the Supreme Court as a function of con...
An attorney’s ability to successfully litigate on behalf of their clients is of paramount importance...
Prior scholarship on the effect of the increasing number of female judges leads to three contrasting...
As the number of Black women have increased in the legal field over the past few decades, we are not...
A recent study by Cass Sunstein identified ideological differences in the votes cast by judges on th...
The intersection of gender—and to a lesser extent, race—and political ambition has been the subject ...
The intersection of gender—and to a lesser extent, race—and political ambition has been the subject ...
Because voters rely on judicial performance evaluations when casting their ballots, it is important ...
My research focuses on determining what composition of a court will respond most favorably to women'...
This article will examine whether candidate sex impacts electoral outcomes in judicial elections. Co...
Women in the United States remain underrepresented in politics, both in the legislature and the judi...
What information do voters rely on in nonpartisan judicial election? When voters lack a partisan cue...
Objectives. To explore differences in the appointment and election method of se-lecting state high c...
A rampant supposition exists that the judicial nominations of females are less successful due to the...
Judge Sonia Sotomayor\u27s assertion that female judges might be better than male judges has gener...
This Article evaluates the success of female attorneys before the Supreme Court as a function of con...
An attorney’s ability to successfully litigate on behalf of their clients is of paramount importance...
Prior scholarship on the effect of the increasing number of female judges leads to three contrasting...
As the number of Black women have increased in the legal field over the past few decades, we are not...
A recent study by Cass Sunstein identified ideological differences in the votes cast by judges on th...
The intersection of gender—and to a lesser extent, race—and political ambition has been the subject ...
The intersection of gender—and to a lesser extent, race—and political ambition has been the subject ...
Because voters rely on judicial performance evaluations when casting their ballots, it is important ...
My research focuses on determining what composition of a court will respond most favorably to women'...