Limited time and budgets have created a legitimate need for quantitative measures of scholarly work. The well-known journal impact factor is the leading measure of this sort; here we describe an alternative approach based on the full structure of the scholarly citation network. The Eigenfactor and Article Influence Score use an iterative ranking scheme similar to Google's PageRank algorithm. With this approach, citations from top journals are weighted more heavily than citations from lower-tier publications. We describe these metrics and the rankings that they provide
This paper proposes an indicator of journals' scientific prestige, the SJR indicator, for ranking sc...
The launching of Scopus and Google Scholar, and methodological developments in social-network analys...
textabstractThis paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefu...
In this article, we show how the Eigenfactor score, origi-nally designed for ranking scholarly journ...
RePEc Working Papers series: No. 67/2010This paper examines the practical usefulness of two new jour...
This paper examines the practical usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, namely the Eige...
This paper examines the practical usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, namely the Eige...
textabstractThis paper examines the practical usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, nam...
Various kinds of metrics used for the quantitative evaluation of scholarly journals are reviewed. Th...
We performed a thorough comparison of four main indicators of journal influence, namely 2-year impac...
textabstractThis paper examines the novelty and usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, n...
Eigenfactor.org, a journal evaluation tool which uses an iterative algorithm to weight citations (si...
This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefulness of two...
This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefulness of two...
The Eigenfactor ™ Metrics provide an alternative way of evaluating scholarly journals based on an it...
This paper proposes an indicator of journals' scientific prestige, the SJR indicator, for ranking sc...
The launching of Scopus and Google Scholar, and methodological developments in social-network analys...
textabstractThis paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefu...
In this article, we show how the Eigenfactor score, origi-nally designed for ranking scholarly journ...
RePEc Working Papers series: No. 67/2010This paper examines the practical usefulness of two new jour...
This paper examines the practical usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, namely the Eige...
This paper examines the practical usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, namely the Eige...
textabstractThis paper examines the practical usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, nam...
Various kinds of metrics used for the quantitative evaluation of scholarly journals are reviewed. Th...
We performed a thorough comparison of four main indicators of journal influence, namely 2-year impac...
textabstractThis paper examines the novelty and usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, n...
Eigenfactor.org, a journal evaluation tool which uses an iterative algorithm to weight citations (si...
This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefulness of two...
This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefulness of two...
The Eigenfactor ™ Metrics provide an alternative way of evaluating scholarly journals based on an it...
This paper proposes an indicator of journals' scientific prestige, the SJR indicator, for ranking sc...
The launching of Scopus and Google Scholar, and methodological developments in social-network analys...
textabstractThis paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefu...