Within the expected-utility framework, the only explanation for risk aversion is that the utility function for wealth is concave: A person has lower marginal utility for additional wealth when she is wealthy than when she is poor. This paper provides a theorem showing that expected-utility theory is an utterly implausible explanation for appreciable risk aversion over modest stakes: Within expected-utility theory, for any concave utility function, even very little risk aversion over modest stakes implies an absurd degree of risk aversion over large stakes. Illustrative calibrations are provided
The calibration theorem by Rabin (2000) implies that seemingly plausible smallstake choices under ri...
We employ a novel data set to estimate a structural econometric model of the decisions under risk of...
Recently, Rabin criticized the use of diminishing marginal utility in explaining risk aversion in sm...
Within the expected-utility framework, the only explanation for risk aversion is that the utility f...
This paper contributes to an important recent debate around expected utility and risk aversion. Reje...
This paper contributes to an important recent debate around expected utility and risk aversion. Reje...
Arrow (1971) shows that an expected-utility maximizer with a differentiable utility function will al...
Rabin (2000) proved that a low level of risk aversion with respect to small gambles leads to a high,...
This paper contributes to an important recent debate around expected utility and risk aversion. Reje...
Rabin (2000) proved that a low level of risk aversion with respect to small gambles leads to a high,...
A reasonable level of risk aversion with respect to small gambles leads to a high, and absurd, level...
A growing literature reports the conclusions that: (a) expected utility theory does not provide a pl...
There is a sizable literature reporting the conclusion that expected utility theory cannot provide a...
A growing literature reports the conclusions that: (a) expected utility theory does not provide a pl...
A reasonable level of risk aversion with respect to small gambles leads to a high, and absurd, level...
The calibration theorem by Rabin (2000) implies that seemingly plausible smallstake choices under ri...
We employ a novel data set to estimate a structural econometric model of the decisions under risk of...
Recently, Rabin criticized the use of diminishing marginal utility in explaining risk aversion in sm...
Within the expected-utility framework, the only explanation for risk aversion is that the utility f...
This paper contributes to an important recent debate around expected utility and risk aversion. Reje...
This paper contributes to an important recent debate around expected utility and risk aversion. Reje...
Arrow (1971) shows that an expected-utility maximizer with a differentiable utility function will al...
Rabin (2000) proved that a low level of risk aversion with respect to small gambles leads to a high,...
This paper contributes to an important recent debate around expected utility and risk aversion. Reje...
Rabin (2000) proved that a low level of risk aversion with respect to small gambles leads to a high,...
A reasonable level of risk aversion with respect to small gambles leads to a high, and absurd, level...
A growing literature reports the conclusions that: (a) expected utility theory does not provide a pl...
There is a sizable literature reporting the conclusion that expected utility theory cannot provide a...
A growing literature reports the conclusions that: (a) expected utility theory does not provide a pl...
A reasonable level of risk aversion with respect to small gambles leads to a high, and absurd, level...
The calibration theorem by Rabin (2000) implies that seemingly plausible smallstake choices under ri...
We employ a novel data set to estimate a structural econometric model of the decisions under risk of...
Recently, Rabin criticized the use of diminishing marginal utility in explaining risk aversion in sm...