We analyze the central economic issues raised by U.S. v Microsoft. Network effects and economies of scale in applications programs created a barrier to entry for new operating system competitors, which the combination of Netscape Navigator and the Java programming language potentially could have lowered. Microsoft took actions to eliminate this threat to its operating system monopoly, and some of Microsoft's conduct very likely harmed consumers. While we recognize the risks of the government's proposed structural remedy of splitting Microsoft in two, we are pessimistic that a limited conduct remedy would be effective in this case
Microsoft Corporation, the largest company in the US software industry, has been under anti-trust sc...
In a recent symposium issue of the George Mason Law Review, Steven Salop and R. Craig Romaine use th...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
We analyze the central economic issues raised by U.S. v Microsoft. Network effects and economies of ...
W hile most antitrust cases proceed in obscurity, the case brought againstMicrosoft by federal and s...
The purpose of this paper is to clarify what Microsoft did wrong that warranted the antitrust case b...
The remedy stage of USA vs. Microsoft Corporation has raised three main controversies: - Conduct vs....
A t some basic level, the government, Microsoft and the district court allagree on what Microsoft di...
By traditional business standards, Microsoft looked like an ideal target for investigation by the De...
The Justice Department's antitrust case against Microsoft Corporation has generated considerable int...
Economic Aspects of the Microsoft Case: Networks, Interoperability and Competitio
U.S. v. Microsoft and the related state suit filed in 1998 appear to have concluded. In a unanimous ...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
In this paper, we discuss the main economic aspects of the European Microsoft case; in particular, M...
This paper analyzes the central antitrust and economic issues raised by network industries. Network ...
Microsoft Corporation, the largest company in the US software industry, has been under anti-trust sc...
In a recent symposium issue of the George Mason Law Review, Steven Salop and R. Craig Romaine use th...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
We analyze the central economic issues raised by U.S. v Microsoft. Network effects and economies of ...
W hile most antitrust cases proceed in obscurity, the case brought againstMicrosoft by federal and s...
The purpose of this paper is to clarify what Microsoft did wrong that warranted the antitrust case b...
The remedy stage of USA vs. Microsoft Corporation has raised three main controversies: - Conduct vs....
A t some basic level, the government, Microsoft and the district court allagree on what Microsoft di...
By traditional business standards, Microsoft looked like an ideal target for investigation by the De...
The Justice Department's antitrust case against Microsoft Corporation has generated considerable int...
Economic Aspects of the Microsoft Case: Networks, Interoperability and Competitio
U.S. v. Microsoft and the related state suit filed in 1998 appear to have concluded. In a unanimous ...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...
In this paper, we discuss the main economic aspects of the European Microsoft case; in particular, M...
This paper analyzes the central antitrust and economic issues raised by network industries. Network ...
Microsoft Corporation, the largest company in the US software industry, has been under anti-trust sc...
In a recent symposium issue of the George Mason Law Review, Steven Salop and R. Craig Romaine use th...
On April 3, 2000, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson declared that the Microsoft Corporatio...