Add to ORKGThis paper was prepared for the Antitrust Section Spring Meeting, Washington D.C., 2004. The author discusses and compares European Community Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation (TTBER) and U.S. Guidelines. Together the guidelines present a framework to evaluate technology licensing arrangements that respects the objectives of EU competition policy and still provides a berth for procompetitive licensing
Defence date: 23 September 2014Examining Board: Professor Giorgio Monti, European University Instit...
Both competition law and intellectual property law are considered good for economic efficiency, but ...
The paper tracks recent developments in the United States and EU competition systems with regard to ...
This paper was prepared for the Antitrust Section Spring Meeting, Washington D.C., 2004. The author...
Innovation is the source of new products and processes that expand the frontiers of competition. Adv...
Transactions involving the transfer of intellectual property rights give rise to antitrust issues, p...
This Article examines and compares the differing treatment of territorial restraints in licensing ag...
This article discusses the legal and economic foundations, as well as the practical implications of ...
Interaction between technology licensing and EU Competition rules drastically changed seven years ag...
Defence Date: 10 May 2010Examining Board: Professor Hanns Ullrich, EUI (Supervisor); Professor Steve...
The book compares how the US and EU antitrust authorities have enforced Section 2 of the Sherman Act...
International audienceThe Essential Facilities Doctrine, albeit an American case-law creation, is al...
There is a growing trend to limit the rights of intellectual property owners when the public interes...
Intellectual property law seeks to promote society's industrial development through the recognition ...
In light of the exponential increase of the number of investigations raising the issue of how to rec...
Defence date: 23 September 2014Examining Board: Professor Giorgio Monti, European University Instit...
Both competition law and intellectual property law are considered good for economic efficiency, but ...
The paper tracks recent developments in the United States and EU competition systems with regard to ...
This paper was prepared for the Antitrust Section Spring Meeting, Washington D.C., 2004. The author...
Innovation is the source of new products and processes that expand the frontiers of competition. Adv...
Transactions involving the transfer of intellectual property rights give rise to antitrust issues, p...
This Article examines and compares the differing treatment of territorial restraints in licensing ag...
This article discusses the legal and economic foundations, as well as the practical implications of ...
Interaction between technology licensing and EU Competition rules drastically changed seven years ag...
Defence Date: 10 May 2010Examining Board: Professor Hanns Ullrich, EUI (Supervisor); Professor Steve...
The book compares how the US and EU antitrust authorities have enforced Section 2 of the Sherman Act...
International audienceThe Essential Facilities Doctrine, albeit an American case-law creation, is al...
There is a growing trend to limit the rights of intellectual property owners when the public interes...
Intellectual property law seeks to promote society's industrial development through the recognition ...
In light of the exponential increase of the number of investigations raising the issue of how to rec...
Defence date: 23 September 2014Examining Board: Professor Giorgio Monti, European University Instit...
Both competition law and intellectual property law are considered good for economic efficiency, but ...
The paper tracks recent developments in the United States and EU competition systems with regard to ...