A review of previous data sets and recent research indicates that Humboldt Basal-notched biface forms are characterized by distinctive temporal spans within the prehistoric record of the southwestern Great Basin. Contrary to previous conclusions, we believe that the biface forms had two distinct periods of use, an early (4000 to 500 B.C.) and a late (500 B.C. to A.D. 800) manifestation. Humboldt Basal-notched bifaces from these two periods can be differentiated typologically and perhaps functionally
Based on lithic studies, it appears that the early inhabitants of the Great Basin were mobile, far-r...
This investigation follows a recent morphological study of the three largest samples of Gahagan bifa...
It is important to recognize a Protohistoric period in the cultural historical chronology of the Gre...
Since the early 1970s, Great Basin archaeologists have debated projectile point chronology, most spe...
There continues to be controversy regarding the typological affinities and temporal placement of bif...
Los Bifaces site, located in the Upper Tar River Basin, comprises an assemblage of at least 11 bifac...
Foliate or leaf-shaped bifacial tools are widely distributed through time and space in the Pacific N...
One of the principle ways that researchers assign sites to particular time periods is using temporal...
The High-Tech Forager Model (HTFM) was developed in the Great Plains region to model Paleoindian lit...
Project files are comprised of 1 page pdf and presentation recording in mp4 format.Some researchers ...
This investigation aggregates intact or reconstructed Gahagan bifaces from the southern Caddo area a...
A peculiar stone with the shape of a heart caught the attention of a young girl in 1916. Her father ...
While Late Middle Palaeolithic industries are characterized by a well-documented diversity of stone ...
This paper explores the evolution and current practice of Great Basin projectile point typology, wit...
Bifacial chipped stones have been used by archaeologists to document the evolution of human technolo...
Based on lithic studies, it appears that the early inhabitants of the Great Basin were mobile, far-r...
This investigation follows a recent morphological study of the three largest samples of Gahagan bifa...
It is important to recognize a Protohistoric period in the cultural historical chronology of the Gre...
Since the early 1970s, Great Basin archaeologists have debated projectile point chronology, most spe...
There continues to be controversy regarding the typological affinities and temporal placement of bif...
Los Bifaces site, located in the Upper Tar River Basin, comprises an assemblage of at least 11 bifac...
Foliate or leaf-shaped bifacial tools are widely distributed through time and space in the Pacific N...
One of the principle ways that researchers assign sites to particular time periods is using temporal...
The High-Tech Forager Model (HTFM) was developed in the Great Plains region to model Paleoindian lit...
Project files are comprised of 1 page pdf and presentation recording in mp4 format.Some researchers ...
This investigation aggregates intact or reconstructed Gahagan bifaces from the southern Caddo area a...
A peculiar stone with the shape of a heart caught the attention of a young girl in 1916. Her father ...
While Late Middle Palaeolithic industries are characterized by a well-documented diversity of stone ...
This paper explores the evolution and current practice of Great Basin projectile point typology, wit...
Bifacial chipped stones have been used by archaeologists to document the evolution of human technolo...
Based on lithic studies, it appears that the early inhabitants of the Great Basin were mobile, far-r...
This investigation follows a recent morphological study of the three largest samples of Gahagan bifa...
It is important to recognize a Protohistoric period in the cultural historical chronology of the Gre...