Not too long ago, nothing was deemed “real.” Now, however, everything seems to be. Why is that, and when did this shift occur? This afterword argues that the influence of an “Arrighian realism” is making itself felt in emergent historical materialist reassessments of how to measure properly historical motion. After the “end of history,” in other words, history went on anyway. This afterword explores the various ways in which this phenomenon has manifested itself and considers how our special issue contributors have questioned and enriched our understanding of realism(s)
This chapter is prompted by recent calls by historians and other scholars for new understandings of ...
A new approach to the relation between historiography of science and scientific realism is discusse
Phenomenological reality seems to be a never ending transformation of observable events. A sequence ...
Not too long ago, nothing was deemed “real.” Now, however, everything seems to be. Why is that, and ...
On one view of time (a view that has gone by the names of tense realism, eternalist A‐theory, hyper‐...
Historical facts are not objects; rather, they are representational processes within other processes...
In this paper I try to sketch a brief history of new realism. Starting from nineteenth century id...
I review prominent historical arguments against scientific realism to indicate how they display a sy...
Despite the basic idea of scenarios as providing a heuristic for identifying, understanding and resp...
Anti-realist philosophers of historiography who are sometimes called constructionists claim that his...
ABSTRACTThis essay offers a reconfiguration of the possibility‐space of positions regarding the meta...
The historical sensibility of Western modernity is best captured by the phrase ‘acting upon a story...
From its inception, much of the discussion around the terms realism and modernism stems from the fac...
The distinction of whether real or counterfactual history makes sense only post factum. However, mod...
In addition to our policies, orderly and linear approaches also affect our understanding of history ...
This chapter is prompted by recent calls by historians and other scholars for new understandings of ...
A new approach to the relation between historiography of science and scientific realism is discusse
Phenomenological reality seems to be a never ending transformation of observable events. A sequence ...
Not too long ago, nothing was deemed “real.” Now, however, everything seems to be. Why is that, and ...
On one view of time (a view that has gone by the names of tense realism, eternalist A‐theory, hyper‐...
Historical facts are not objects; rather, they are representational processes within other processes...
In this paper I try to sketch a brief history of new realism. Starting from nineteenth century id...
I review prominent historical arguments against scientific realism to indicate how they display a sy...
Despite the basic idea of scenarios as providing a heuristic for identifying, understanding and resp...
Anti-realist philosophers of historiography who are sometimes called constructionists claim that his...
ABSTRACTThis essay offers a reconfiguration of the possibility‐space of positions regarding the meta...
The historical sensibility of Western modernity is best captured by the phrase ‘acting upon a story...
From its inception, much of the discussion around the terms realism and modernism stems from the fac...
The distinction of whether real or counterfactual history makes sense only post factum. However, mod...
In addition to our policies, orderly and linear approaches also affect our understanding of history ...
This chapter is prompted by recent calls by historians and other scholars for new understandings of ...
A new approach to the relation between historiography of science and scientific realism is discusse
Phenomenological reality seems to be a never ending transformation of observable events. A sequence ...