According to indicators of political repression currently used by scholars, human rights practices have not improved over the past 35 years, despite the spread of human rights norms, better monitoring, and the increasing prevalence of electoral democracy. I argue that this empirical pattern is not an indication of stagnating human rights practices. Instead, it reflects a systematic change in the way monitors encounter and interpret information about abuses. The standard of accountability used to assess state behaviors becomes more stringent as monitors look harder for abuse, look in more places for abuse, and classify more acts as abuse. In chapter 1, I present a new, theoretically informed measurement model, which generates unbiased estima...
This article discusses whether it is viable to compare different human rights violations
Does the presence of a pro-government militia worsen the human rights of a country even after contro...
Scholars contend that the reason for stasis in human rights measures is a biased measurement process...
According to indicators of political repression currently used by scholars, human rights practices h...
Researchers have puzzled over the finding that countries that ratify UN human rights treaties such a...
This is the replication files for the APSR article: Are Human Rights Practices Improving? Abstrac...
The monitoring of human rights performance is increasingly a measurement exercise. This is true for ...
To document human rights, monitoring organizations establish a standard of accountability, or a base...
Has respect for human rights improved? Answering this question requires valid comparisons of repres...
Mass human rights violations are among the most pressing international problems facing policy makers...
International human rights treaties have been ratified by many nation-states, including those ruled ...
Human rights have improved but not everywhere and for everyone. Scholarship has focused on domestic ...
The turn to quantified measures is part of an attempt to produce more objective and comprehensive da...
A science of human rights requires valid comparisons of repression levels across time and space. Tho...
This study explores the effects humanitarian interventions have on the human right status in a count...
This article discusses whether it is viable to compare different human rights violations
Does the presence of a pro-government militia worsen the human rights of a country even after contro...
Scholars contend that the reason for stasis in human rights measures is a biased measurement process...
According to indicators of political repression currently used by scholars, human rights practices h...
Researchers have puzzled over the finding that countries that ratify UN human rights treaties such a...
This is the replication files for the APSR article: Are Human Rights Practices Improving? Abstrac...
The monitoring of human rights performance is increasingly a measurement exercise. This is true for ...
To document human rights, monitoring organizations establish a standard of accountability, or a base...
Has respect for human rights improved? Answering this question requires valid comparisons of repres...
Mass human rights violations are among the most pressing international problems facing policy makers...
International human rights treaties have been ratified by many nation-states, including those ruled ...
Human rights have improved but not everywhere and for everyone. Scholarship has focused on domestic ...
The turn to quantified measures is part of an attempt to produce more objective and comprehensive da...
A science of human rights requires valid comparisons of repression levels across time and space. Tho...
This study explores the effects humanitarian interventions have on the human right status in a count...
This article discusses whether it is viable to compare different human rights violations
Does the presence of a pro-government militia worsen the human rights of a country even after contro...
Scholars contend that the reason for stasis in human rights measures is a biased measurement process...