All-cause mortality by age and gender based on coronary artery calcium scores.

AimsAlthough coronary artery calcium (CAC) has been established as a robust tool for predicting total mortality during intermediate follow-up, less is known about the long-term predictive value of CAC.Methods and resultsThis study included 13 092 asymptomatic patients without known cardiovascular disease who underwent a clinically indicated CAC scan. CAC was categorized as an Agatson score of 0, 1-99, 100-399, and ≥400. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality stratified by age (younger, intermediate, or older) and gender. The mean age of participants was 58 ± 11 years and 67% were men. During a median follow-up of 11.0 ± 3.2 years, there were 522 deaths (4.0%). Compared with CAC = 0, increasing CAC was associated with higher mortality rate: 1-99 [HR: 1.5, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.1-2.1]; 100-399 (HR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.5); ≥400 (HR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.9-3.6). Relative risk according to CAC category did not differ between genders. The strongest associations between CAC and mortality were observed for young and intermediate age participants. Nonetheless, the mortality rate of the older patients with CAC = 0 was far lower than that of the general US population. CAC was more predictive of long-term (15 years) than intermediate-term (5 years) mortality for men [receiver operator characteristics (ROC): 0.723 vs. 0.702] and women (ROC: 0.69 vs. 0.65).ConclusionCAC is strongly associated with the long-term risk of mortality in young- and middle-aged men and women. In older patients, the long-term risk stratification of CAC is lower, due principally to increased mortality rate in patients with low calcium scores; however, even in the older patients, those with absent or low CAC are at a significantly lower risk of mortality compared with the general population