Add to ORKGIn this essay, we build on the existing literature on the use of legal strategies for addressing problems of biased judgment and behavior, exploring how heuristics and biases may be exploited to foster efficiency in the presence of other incentive alignment problems. We also introduce two new categories: the hitherto unnoticed counterparts to debiasing and insulating strategies, which we will call benevolent biasing, and cognitive leveraging strategies
There are empirical grounds to doubt the effectiveness of a common and intuitive approach to teachin...
Behavioral studies indicate that individuals do not always make objective decisions about risk. Vari...
Although legal contexts are subject to biased reasoning and decision making, to identify and test de...
In this essay, we build on the existing literature on the use of legal strategies for addressing pro...
In this essay, we build on the existing literature on the use of legal strategies for addressing pro...
Empirical and experimental evidence shows that individuals exhibit behavioral biases in their decisi...
In many settings, human beings are boundedly rational. A distinctive and insufficiently explored leg...
How can empirical science, and psychology in particular, be harnessed to avoid or eliminate unwanted...
New work on heuristics and biases has explored the role of emotions and affect; the idea of “dual pr...
This Essay, prepared in connection with the Marquette University Conference on Plea Bargaining: Unde...
When people are placed in a partisan role or otherwise have an objective they seek to accomplish, th...
Recent work in the behavioral sciences asserts that we are subject to a variety of cognitive biases....
Human decision-making is often influenced by various departures from perfect rationality; it is also...
When we consider bias in an adjudicative setting, we think about cases such as Baker v. Canada where...
Professor Neitz is the author of Chapter 6: When Myths Become Beliefs: Implicit Socioeconomic Bias i...
There are empirical grounds to doubt the effectiveness of a common and intuitive approach to teachin...
Behavioral studies indicate that individuals do not always make objective decisions about risk. Vari...
Although legal contexts are subject to biased reasoning and decision making, to identify and test de...
In this essay, we build on the existing literature on the use of legal strategies for addressing pro...
In this essay, we build on the existing literature on the use of legal strategies for addressing pro...
Empirical and experimental evidence shows that individuals exhibit behavioral biases in their decisi...
In many settings, human beings are boundedly rational. A distinctive and insufficiently explored leg...
How can empirical science, and psychology in particular, be harnessed to avoid or eliminate unwanted...
New work on heuristics and biases has explored the role of emotions and affect; the idea of “dual pr...
This Essay, prepared in connection with the Marquette University Conference on Plea Bargaining: Unde...
When people are placed in a partisan role or otherwise have an objective they seek to accomplish, th...
Recent work in the behavioral sciences asserts that we are subject to a variety of cognitive biases....
Human decision-making is often influenced by various departures from perfect rationality; it is also...
When we consider bias in an adjudicative setting, we think about cases such as Baker v. Canada where...
Professor Neitz is the author of Chapter 6: When Myths Become Beliefs: Implicit Socioeconomic Bias i...
There are empirical grounds to doubt the effectiveness of a common and intuitive approach to teachin...
Behavioral studies indicate that individuals do not always make objective decisions about risk. Vari...
Although legal contexts are subject to biased reasoning and decision making, to identify and test de...