Add to ORKGThis paper explores whether brain images may be admitted as evidence in criminal trials under Federal Rule of Evidence 403, which weighs probative value against the danger of being prejudicial, confusing, or misleading to fact finders. The paper summarizes and evaluates recent empirical research relevant to these issues. We argue that currently the probative value of neuroimages for criminal responsibility is minimal, and there is some evidence of their potential to be prejudicial or misleading. We also propose experiments that will directly assess how jurors are influenced by brain images
Novel methods of memory detection promise to transform criminal justice. Neural test results provide...
Over the several decades of its existence, brain imag-ing has moved from the laboratory to the bedsi...
This article addresses new developments in neuroscience, and their implications for law. It explores...
This paper explores whether brain images may be admitted as evidence in criminal trials under Federa...
Recent advances in brain imaging technologies allow researchers to peer inside a defendant\u27s br...
Neuroimaging evidence should be restricted in terms of admissibility in the courts, and should only ...
Neurobiological evidence in the form of brain scans (MRI images, PET images, etc.) is being introduc...
This article addresses the question of the relevance of brain imaging to legal criteria that are beh...
The admissibility of neuroscientific evidence is becoming an increasingly important issue for Americ...
This contribution to the Brain Sciences in the Courtroom Symposium identifies and discusses issues i...
Various neuroscientific techniques are increasingly being used in criminal courts causing a vivid de...
This exploratory paper seeks to examine the use of neuroscientific evidence in the criminal trial pr...
Advancements in technology have now made it possible for scientists to provide assessments of an ind...
Much courtroom evidence relies on assessing witness memory. Recent advances in brain imaging analysi...
My empirical study, which examines neuroscience evidence in 800 criminal cases over the course of tw...
Novel methods of memory detection promise to transform criminal justice. Neural test results provide...
Over the several decades of its existence, brain imag-ing has moved from the laboratory to the bedsi...
This article addresses new developments in neuroscience, and their implications for law. It explores...
This paper explores whether brain images may be admitted as evidence in criminal trials under Federa...
Recent advances in brain imaging technologies allow researchers to peer inside a defendant\u27s br...
Neuroimaging evidence should be restricted in terms of admissibility in the courts, and should only ...
Neurobiological evidence in the form of brain scans (MRI images, PET images, etc.) is being introduc...
This article addresses the question of the relevance of brain imaging to legal criteria that are beh...
The admissibility of neuroscientific evidence is becoming an increasingly important issue for Americ...
This contribution to the Brain Sciences in the Courtroom Symposium identifies and discusses issues i...
Various neuroscientific techniques are increasingly being used in criminal courts causing a vivid de...
This exploratory paper seeks to examine the use of neuroscientific evidence in the criminal trial pr...
Advancements in technology have now made it possible for scientists to provide assessments of an ind...
Much courtroom evidence relies on assessing witness memory. Recent advances in brain imaging analysi...
My empirical study, which examines neuroscience evidence in 800 criminal cases over the course of tw...
Novel methods of memory detection promise to transform criminal justice. Neural test results provide...
Over the several decades of its existence, brain imag-ing has moved from the laboratory to the bedsi...
This article addresses new developments in neuroscience, and their implications for law. It explores...