This Article examines the nature of the federal role in public education following the recent passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act in December 2015 (“ESSA”). Public education was largely unregulated for much of our Nation’s history, with the federal government deferring to states’ traditional “police powers” despite the de jure entrenchment of racial and class-based inequalities. A nascent policy of education federalism finally took root following the Brown v. Board decision and the enactment of the Elementary and Secondary School Act (“ESEA”) with the explicit purpose of eradicating such educational inequality. This timely Article argues that current federal education policy, as embodied by ESSA, has displaced the federalism values of...
One of the most important functions of the government is the provision of a free public education. W...
This Article discusses the relationship between federal equal protection doctrine and the states' ex...
In the Rodriguez decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the plaintiffs did not have a right unde...
When passed in 2001, the No Child Left Behind Act represented the federal government’s most dramatic...
When passed in 2001, the No Child Left Behind Act represented the federal government’s most dramatic...
Great Society reformers targeted poverty as the defining characteristic for a novel federal educatio...
This Article analyzes the intersection of state constitutional law with federal equal protection, re...
Since the Great Recession of 2007–09, states have devoted even less money to public education and st...
The ongoing expansion of federal influence over education in the United States provides a particular...
Over the last sixty years, the federal government has adopted laws aimed at eradicating inequality a...
Over the last sixty years, the federal government has adopted laws aimed at eradicating inequality a...
Over the last sixty years, the federal government has adopted laws aimed at eradicating inequality a...
This Article discusses the relationship between federal equal protection doctrine and the states\u27...
Building on the premise that closing achievement gaps is an economic imperative both to regain inter...
ESEA's original intent was to provide educational assistance to less privileged students. However, E...
One of the most important functions of the government is the provision of a free public education. W...
This Article discusses the relationship between federal equal protection doctrine and the states' ex...
In the Rodriguez decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the plaintiffs did not have a right unde...
When passed in 2001, the No Child Left Behind Act represented the federal government’s most dramatic...
When passed in 2001, the No Child Left Behind Act represented the federal government’s most dramatic...
Great Society reformers targeted poverty as the defining characteristic for a novel federal educatio...
This Article analyzes the intersection of state constitutional law with federal equal protection, re...
Since the Great Recession of 2007–09, states have devoted even less money to public education and st...
The ongoing expansion of federal influence over education in the United States provides a particular...
Over the last sixty years, the federal government has adopted laws aimed at eradicating inequality a...
Over the last sixty years, the federal government has adopted laws aimed at eradicating inequality a...
Over the last sixty years, the federal government has adopted laws aimed at eradicating inequality a...
This Article discusses the relationship between federal equal protection doctrine and the states\u27...
Building on the premise that closing achievement gaps is an economic imperative both to regain inter...
ESEA's original intent was to provide educational assistance to less privileged students. However, E...
One of the most important functions of the government is the provision of a free public education. W...
This Article discusses the relationship between federal equal protection doctrine and the states' ex...
In the Rodriguez decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the plaintiffs did not have a right unde...