¿Democracia liberal o absolutismo en Hobbes?

Thomas Hobbes and his Leviathan may be interpreted from two differetn viewpoints: one which may be called classical or the defence of absolutism; and the other which shall be named liberal democrat. When we speak of Hobbes, we may understand that there are differing interpretations, given that the said author moves in a dichotomous environment, plagued by both good and evil motives. The interest of this article stems from an interpretation of Leviathan in support of my thesis: that Hobbes defended a democracy that, despite being endowed with a great power, does not prevent the democratic exercise of the said power.A Tomás Hobbes y su Leviatán es posible interpretarlos desde dos puntos de vista diferentes: uno que podemos denominar clásico o defensor del absolutismo y otro que llamaremos democrático liberal.Cuando se habla de Hobbes se comprende la existencia de interpretaciones divergentes, dado que dicho autor se mueve en un ambiente dicotómico, plagado de buenas y malas razones.El interés de este artículo radica en interpretar el Leviatán, a fin de apoyar mi tesis: Hobbes defensor de una democracia, aunque dotada de un poder fuerte que no impida el ejercicio democrático del mismo